EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

Twilight and Substanceless Romance

It’s been a while since I’ve joined in on a non-movie cultural phenomenon. I skipped Harry Potter, and I’ve never really paid much attention to contemporary music or American Idol. (Do I feel bad for this? Not at all.)

But at the urging of a friend and on the strength of my curiosity, I cracked open the latest teen sensation Twilight, the first in a series by Stephanie Meyer. And I’m not sure I’m better for it.

But first, a random Twilight fact for those who are the least bit interested. The bulk of the story takes place in the Pacific Northwest in a small town named Forks. I, unlike most of the world, have been to Forks. In fact, they were in the same league as my high school, so I have played basketball inside their tiny gym. The thing I remember best about Forks—besides their rabid fans—was a sign over the entryway to their gym reminding students(!) to discard their chewing tobacco prior to entering. Seriously. And yes, this post is largely an excuse to tell that story.

Meyers’ novel is badly written, but like any writing, that’s not simply a function of her style. She didn’t give herself much plot to work with, as the central drama is about the blossoming relationship between Isabella and Edward, the latter of whom is…a vampire. And oh, what a drama. At least if you enjoy an ongoing self-reflection by two people who are in love, but have little else to say to each other.

Consider this bit of saccharine prose, as Edward plays the piano for Bella:

“I closed my eyes, shaking my head.”

“What’s wrong?”

“I’m feeling extremely insignificant.”

The music slowed, transforming into something softer, and to my surprise I detected the melody of his lullaby weaving through the profusion of notes.

“You inspired this one,” he said softly. The music grew unbearably sweet.

Unbearable, indeed. Edward’s playing is, apparently, no better opportunity for some healthy self-disclosure about Isabella’s insecurities. Nevermind the fact that he’s playing piano, and there might be something interesting to say about that. Yet this sort of self-consciousness (and always of the pseudo-deep variety) pervades their relationship.

Unfortunately, Meyer’s depiction of high school love is, on this point, devastatingly accurate. For most young people, their eroticism lacks substance. It has no matter—no depth. And no wonder—most young people do not have to deal with the daily responsibilities of bills, provisions, and shelter. As in Meyer’s novel, they have an enormous amount of time they have to do nothing together, which often causes the relationship to be turned inward and strips it of its interesting content.

Paying bills may be a burdensome task, but it is the substance of real life, and as such, is the fuel for love and a healthy relationship. If anything, the freedom from real responsibilities Meyer’s teens enjoy makes for nauseating reading rather than an enjoyable romance.

Comments

My 16 year old daughter loved these books.

She is maturing now and is only beginning to understand the shallowness of the story. I don't think she takes it seriously and does recognize the silliness of romantic utopia. (at least I hope she recognizes it as silly)

I don't think these books are much different than the characterization of romance on the Bachelor or Bachelorette...talk about self indulgence and narcissism.

PS Matt, Just thought you would like to know that I have changed my negative attitude towards marriage and I am trying to make an effort of getting out of my shell and meeting other single christian men. You have been influential in bringing about that healthy change. Thank you.

bluediamond,

That comment has made this long, laborious process worthwhile. Seriously, you have NO idea how much that comment means to me.

I think you're right about the depth of Twighlight relative to the Bachelor/Bachelorette. I suspect that's largely the reason why Twighlight is so successful these days.

Try to turn her on to Jane Austen instead. Someday, I'm going to write a book with all the different lessons about love I've learned from classic literature. That will be the day this book project is finished..... : )

Matt,

First let me start off by saying that I adamantly avoided the Twilight series for a variety of reasons. Mainly, romantic vampires? Right.

BUT I like that you touched on the idea of true romance. In my own life and relationships, I have found that as I get older I realize more and more that passion and fury are emotions of salt. A little bit does great good, but too much and the foundation of the relationship will not support it. As I get older I have found it much more romantic and intimate to instead go slow and take time - to NOT be in a rush. It seems to add an element of respect and deep care for the other person that is truly not selfish. I feel so grown up :-)

-Jenni

Jenni,

The thought of beautiful, blood-sucking men doesn't do it for you? C'mon!

I actually think (more on this next week, actually) the romantic vampire aspect is one of the most interesting aspects of the series.

I like your expression 'emotions of salt' a lot. I think that's a great description--they enhance the flavor of love, but do not alter the substance of it. If anything, it seems like the particular passions might further reveal the nature of the underlying affection.

And you must be grown up if you avoided the Twighlight craze. After all, I think the first book is written somewhere near a first grade reading level...... : )

matt

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
'from fire by fire' is a place to explore issues of singleness, romance and God. I want to ask better questions about these issues than any you have yet encountered...


Media