<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.conversantlife.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>mary kate olsen</title>
 <link>http://www.conversantlife.com/topics2/1374/%2A</link>
 <description>Created to display Convesant content only</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&quot;In&quot; and &quot;Out&quot; is so 2009</title>
 <link>http://www.conversantlife.com/trend/in-and-out-is-so-2009</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;entry&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;snap_preview&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-1296&quot; src=&quot;http://stillsearching.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/mary-kate.jpg?w=116&amp;amp;h=199&quot; alt=&quot;mary-kate&quot; title=&quot;mary-kate&quot; width=&quot;116&quot; height=&quot;199&quot; /&gt; &lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-1293&quot; src=&quot;http://stillsearching.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/heidi-spencer.jpg?w=236&amp;amp;h=199&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;236&quot; height=&quot;199&quot; /&gt; &lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-1297&quot; src=&quot;http://stillsearching.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/bike.jpg?w=115&amp;amp;h=199&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;115&quot; height=&quot;199&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I’ve been thinking a lot about trendiness of late (probably because
I’m writing a book that deals largely with questions of cool,
relevance, and trendiness in the context of Christianity). I’ve also
been thinking about transience in general—impermanence, aging, death,
things like that (probably because I just watched &lt;a href=&quot;http://stillsearching.wordpress.com/2008/11/01/synecdoche-new-york/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Synecdoche New York &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;again). The two are related, of course. Nothing lasts in life—whether we’re talking about youth or our favorite TV show.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In my book I’m trying to locate “hip” in the context of metaphysics.
How does the idea of being fashionable, cool, etc. correspond to our
existence? We talk about it as a cultural construct all the time—and
certainly this is important—but is it more elemental than that? Is the
ephemeral in fashion and “cool” paralleled or derived from the
ephemeral in our own very existence? In other words: is it a
coincidence that 1) we all desire “cool,” 2) “cool” is necessarily an
ever-changing, constantly cannibalizing phenomenon, and 3) we are all
aware of death and the urgency of living?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyway, whether or not that makes complete sense or not, it got me
thinking about the phrase “___ is the new ___.” It’s funny how fast
something cool becomes old and is supplanted by something “new”… I
mean, it’s like we acknowledge that we never really liked X all that
much in the first place, now that we have Y. It’s like we are admitting
that the reason we value something has nothing to do with its inherent
qualities (our appreciation of which should theoretically withstand the
winds of fashion) but everything to do with its cultural cache. But
then again, perhaps we’re just being honest with ourselves: a scarf or
musician or restaurant can never enchant us permanently, because as
humans on this decaying planet we really only know how to deal in
impermanence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyway, that led me to think of some current examples of “___ is the new ___.”
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Overplayed pop princesses:&lt;/strong&gt; Lady Gaga is the new Rihanna
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Healthy yuppie breakfast: &lt;/strong&gt;Oatmeal is the new yogurt-and-granola
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Confections: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seriouseats.com/2007/10/introduction-to-french-macarons.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Macarons &lt;/a&gt;are the new cupcakes
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;High end icy desserts:&lt;/strong&gt; Shave ice is the new Fro-yo
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Hip hop beats: &lt;/strong&gt;Exotic jungle bird sounds are the new 808s
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Bearded hipster musicians: &lt;/strong&gt;Dan Deacon is the new Sam Beam
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Cable news-fueled paranoia:&lt;/strong&gt; Swine flu is the new Recession
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Sunglasses: &lt;/strong&gt;John Lennons are the new Ray-Bans
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;NPR name dropping: &lt;/strong&gt;Saying you hate waterboarding is the new saying you love &lt;em&gt;Mad Men.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Hipster bars: &lt;/strong&gt;Classy speakeasies are the new ironic biker dives
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So what other examples can you think of?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.conversantlife.com/trend/in-and-out-is-so-2009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/1376">dan deacon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/875">fashion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/422">hipster</category>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/1375">lady gaga</category>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/1374">mary kate olsen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/1377">swine flu</category>
 <category domain="http://www.conversantlife.com/taxonomy/term/1373">trend</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:33:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brett McCracken</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21870 at http://www.conversantlife.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

