
I'm
teaching in Canada this week at a place where the international mix of
guests, staff, and students always makes for lively discussion. I could
tell you about conversations regarding health care (I hope you'll talk
to some real live Canadians and Europeans, whose assessments of this
subject might be a tad more realistic than Rush Limbaugh's) but I'll
save it for another time because there's a more important subject worth
considering.
Last night, after my lecture, I spent some time
with a couple of German women who are passing through Canada on holiday
before returning to their medical careers in Europe. Both were raised
in the communist, totalitarianism of the GDR (East Germany) and even
the small fragments of their story that I learned last night are worth
sharing with you so that you ponder some important questions with me.
They spoke of their childhood, and the role that the church played in
the demise of communism. They spoke of the challenges that came with
growing up as Christ followers in a political climate intent on
silencing any vestiges of the gospel. They explained how, towards the
end of communism's run, the church buildings of old became strategic
centers where people gathered for to offer prayers for a change in
national direction. The few became groups. Groups became 'the masses'.
The masses became a national movement. And the walls came down.
"Right
after freedom came" one said, "the churches were full. Everyone came."
Then, after a moment of silence, the other said, "but not anymore. I
suppose it's the materialism that comes with freedom." I I left our
conversation shortly after that, feeling that our conversation held
some significant elements to ponder. In my ponderings, I've been
reminded of several things:
1. Historically, it's the people who are, existentially speaking, sojourners,
that live clinging to God. Consider the Black Church in America, or the
Reformationists in the midst of Catholicism, or the Radical
Reformationists in the midst of the Reformationists, or the house
churches in China, or the random few believers in Eastern Europe in the
mid-twentieth century. It always seems to be true that it's the people
without the power that are clinging to Christ most profoundly and, in
their clinging, are shaped by God's heart, filled with unquenchable
light.
2. This unquenchable light seems to shine as long as
we're sojourners, but it also seems true that as soon as we settle
down, we settle into darkness. Political power has seduced the church
countless times throughout history. It's as if the church, at various
times, has 'gained the whole world, but lost it's soul'. Mediocrity,
greed, complacency, division, boredom, and gross materialism become
hallmarks of the people of God, who increasingly mirror the values of
the principalities and powers of this world. Thus does salt lose its
saltiness. Thus do we suffer loss as we gain.
I wonder if I'm
right, and if I am right, I wonder what can be done about it. As
Eastern Europe gains their own versions of Walmart and Costco; as they
fill their ears with the buds of ipods and their minds with our values,
their churches are emptying. What does that tell us? I know what Jesus
says: "No man can serve two masters." But I'm wondering what we, who
didn't ask to be born into wealth and comfort, can do, to become
sojourners who are clinging desperately to our God, rather than
settlers who've made a pact with the comforts of this world, and in the
process blown out our candles?
I welcome your thoughts...
Comments
I think about this often, and I wonder why the Church is not trying to combat materialism the way it tries to combat sexual impurity? We have all these programs aimed at teens trying to get them to reject the sexual mores of our culture, but I haven't seen one that asks for a pledge to "give all they have to the poor", or be more generous with the wealth that comes their way, or anything that fights against the consumer culture and mindset we live in. No calls to sacrifice and give like the Macedonians(?) in their extreme poverty. But we have churches that preach that God wants to bless you and prosper you and make you rich (of course, some do claim it's "so that you can bless others", but still you're getting rich and enjoying all the benefits of comfort and security and ease that riches seem to bring).
And I'm as guilty as anyone else -- fixing up my house, wanting something nicer, newer, when the old would function just fine, trying to keep up with fashion and style -- where is the balance? Or is it even balance that we should be seeking? Should we be going for something more radical?