EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

Is My Seeker Church Encouraging Me Toward Minimal Commitment?

My leanings toward reformed theology make me reject the terminology of a “seeker” church. We don’t seek God; He seeks us. Nonetheless, you know what I mean when I use the label. So, allow me to say that I attend a seeker church. I don’t want to be in a seeker church, but it seems clear to my wife and me that God has directed us to this church. So, we’re staying (for now, knowing that God directs our steps while we can’t always understand the journey – Proverbs 20:24).


I take some solace in the fact that I’m not sure the church wants to be seekerish. I detect evidence of schizophrenia. It wants to go deeper, but I think it feels that it needs to be more seeker-oriented to be perceived as hip and culturally relevant up here in the Pacific Northwest – apparently the most “unchurched” region in the U.S.

So, I’ve been sitting in the sanctuary the last few month’s staring at the church motto that is emblazoned on the proscenium arch: Be, Belong, Believe . . . Become. I don’t agree with the sequence of the words; I think the “Belong” should come after the “Believe.” But here is how the church explains it:


BE: We come to Christ just as we are. Flaws and all. We don’t have to “clean up our act” first. We can come as broken, damaged individuals. No games. No pretending to be something we are not. (“God loved us while we were yet sinners,” to say it in King James phraseology.)


BELONG: As a church, we don’t want to impose any obstacles to someone getting to know Christ. So, we want the non-Christian to feel comfortable in our services. We don’t require anything of these seekers. They can attend as infrequently as they want; no pressure to attend regularly; no “new members” class forced on them; no pressure to plop a few bucks in the offering bucket. (Yes, we use actual galvanized buckets, and sometimes muffin baskets. But I digress.) In other words, if a seeker on a spiritual journey is looking for a spiritually-minded group, we want such seekers to feel like they are welcome, accepted and belong in our church family. We respect that they have questions and aren’t yet at a place of making a decision. What better place than our church to continue on the journey.


BELIEVE: Ideally, the sense of “belonging” will provide connections that keep the seeker returning to our church, and this continued exposure to the Gospel message will result in the seeker’s salvation.


BECOME: Paul calls it the “prize” or the “goal.” The seminary guys call it sanctification. Simply put, it is the process by which we move toward becoming more Christ-like.


In all areas of my life, I have answers for questions that no one is asking me. Church isn’t any different. So, on the subject of the church motto, if I had been asked, I would have said that “Belong” goes after “Believe” -- because it is only after you believe that you belong to the family of God as a child of God. But since they didn’t ask me, I’m forced to concede to the church’s interpretation by which “Belong” precedes “Believe.”


But here is the problem. When the “Belong” is before the “Believe,” there is no accountability required of the seeker. Christ’s mandate of Matthew 22:37 to “love God and love others” applies to those who desire to follow Him. Until the seeker makes this commitment, the seeker is excused from the sacrificial behavior that is appropriate for disciples of Christ. And because we don’t want to scare the seeker out of the pew, we seldom talk about the high cost of following Christ, as in “deny yourself and pick up your cross daily” (Luke 9:23).


So, there is a danger that the seeker will think that the minimal commitment of an occasional visit to church may be all that is necessary as one enters the “Believe” stage. If that happens, we’re guilty of false advertising because you can’t get to “Become” if you enter at “Believe” with the expectation and intention that minimal commitment is all that is required.


Why am I uncomfortable with all of this? Because God is making me squirm in my seat as I feel the weight of my own guilt for moving toward a convenient Christianity. I'm in the process of "becoming," but only in the sense of "becoming a complacent Christian." I find that I've morphed my Christianity into one that fits comfortably into my schedule and circumstances. One that doesn’t require too much of me, yet just enough where I feel spiritual.


I’ve got to stop worrying about how the church motto might mislead seekers, and pay more attention to how I’ve been misleading myself. I’ve got to abandon my rants at the sequence of “Belong” and “Believe.” Instead, I need to focus on the ellipsis in the church motto – those three dots that precede “Become.” That’s the place where I am living, smack dab at the “. . .” of Be, Belong, Believe . . . Become. I’ve passed through the other stages (regardless of whether you put “Belong” or the left or right side of “Believe”). I’m living in the dots.


Although I know the theology behind the dots that represent the process of sanctification, maybe I need something more blatant. Maybe I should ask my church to slightly modify the motto on the proscenium arch. They can keep the sequence of the words according to their established preference, but for my benefit perhaps the ellipsis could be translated into something more definitive. Something like: Be, Belong, Believe, Deny Yourself, Become. It loses the alliteration, but it is a better reminder for me than “. . .”

Comments

Thanks for these thoughts Bruce- I tend to agree with you. I think most people- seekers included- want to be called into something significant, even scary. That's why Christ is compelling- he told us to walk away from it all and follow Him. The promise was His presence and to change the world, not to be comfortable. I think we do a disservice to seekers and new believers when we down play the cost (and the benefits).

Crissy - I sure agree with you. And we often even screw of the "benefits" part of it, emphasizing eternal salvation more than intimate fellowship with Christ.

I don't think the new motto would scare off many. I am reminded of church growth that occurs under repressive governments. I am reminded of a young man in Yemen who suffered imprisonment and torture for his new faith in Christ and escaped the country to avoid death. After watching this process, others with their eyes wide open, followed in his footsteps toward denying themselves and taking up their own cross and following Christ.

Doc -- Beautiful example. I hadn't thought of it from that perspective, but I think you are right. Probably more than we realize even the seeker is willing to pay a price for the sake of spiritual truth. Thanks for the insight.

I'm serving on a "relational discipleship" team in our church (that's another way of saying we want our discipleship program to be touchy-feely), and I've been wrestling with these same issues. I would say (and most people in our church would agree) that our church is a body of "consumers," something most people in our church recognize as less than desirable. After going through a thorough church-wide vision study over the past year, the consensus seems to be that we no longer want to be consumers. We want to be disciples. (And it took a year to figure that out. You would think that we could have saved a lot of time and consulting fees if we had simply read the commission Jesus gave to His disciples.)

Anyway, as I've been serving on this team, the thought has come to me that maybe we're going about this all wrong. By trying to create programs and formats that are the most appealing, and fit most conveniently into peoples' schedules and lifestyles, we have become the very thing we say we don't want to be. My fear is that in creating new discipleship programs, we will be driven by the same values, which in effect will keep us locked in as consumers (only we can say that we are consuming discipleship).

Maybe what we need to do is do the opposite of what we think will work (like George Costanza did) and set the bar for discipleship so high that only those who are serious about following Christ--serious enough to put God and His Kingdom before their other priorities--need apply. Maybe we need to stop trying to make church so convenient and attractive. I'm not saying we should make it into something detestable and irrelevant...no, wait, we've already done that. Never mind.

Seriously, what about doing something so radical that it inconveniences people and puts them on notice that unless you are serious about following Jesus, the process of becoming a disciple isn't for you. I agree with your church that anybody should be able to come to church and feel welcome, but if they are never challenged beyond the belong and believe to become something entirely different--what does the Bible say, a "new creature"?--we're just going to continue to be churches build on consumerism and convenience.

Maybe what I'm saying is that "living in the dots" needs to be something that isn't easy or comfortable. Living in the dots needs to be a process that requires a radical commitment and sacrifice so that in the end, as we "become," we can become the people God wants us to be, not the people we want to be.

Thoughts?

I agree that convenience and comfort are probably counter-intuitive to growth in the Christian walk, and I wonder if any program can truly be an integral part of discipleship? It seems to me that "doing something so radical that it inconveniences people and puts them on notice" is God's job; could it be that churches and programs often just get in His way?

Lately I have been wondering about the relevance of the institutional church. It does any important job of Bible teaching, but mostly to people who have already heard the lesson 10 times before, as more and more of us have salt and pepper sprinkled in our hair. The people who need to hear the gospel are mostly not in the church service. I think the the challenge to discipleship comes ultimately from Christ himself, not from man. We need to have small group Bible study and accountability groups, but the ultimate radical challenge that "put them on notice" will be Christ's words in scripture, not the decision of a discipleship committee or the challenge of a new member of the pastoral staff.

You comments are very helpful, Doc, as are the comments from just curious. I agree that no program or individual can match the word of God when it comes to creating a desire for discipleship, but what responsibility to those of us "in" the church (especially those of us with salt and pepper sprinkled in our hair!) have to create "incentives" that at the very least encourage people to embark on a lifelong pattern of learning from Christ?

I guess it comes down to carrying out Jesus' command to "make disciples." That implies action on our part, but there's no template beyond that. In the second half of the 20th century, the traditional church seemed to be the primary way of making disciples, along with a lot of "one-on-one" work employed by groups like the Navigators and CMBC (the Timothy program). These days the paradigm seems to have shifted away from these methods to the small group experience. Your thoughts on small group Bible study and accountability groups reflect what is perhaps the best way of encouraging people to enter a life of discipleship, mainly because its built on relationships, not mere instruction.

As we see in scripture, there will always be a church. As a body we will be the "bride of Christ." My concern is that what we are now calling church is slipping away from its relevance. I read recently that 80% of young adult evangelical Christians do not identify a local congregation as important in their spiritual life (http://tiny.cc/barna). They relate to other Christians at work, in accountability groups and house churches or home Bible studies. I wonder if a second Reformation is starting, this time not on doctrinal grounds, but on grounds of relevance. Will church historians look back on this time in the future and say it was about the turn of the millenium that Christianity took a turn for small groups and more intense personal relationships? Will this mark the decline of the traditional evangelical church, following the pathway of main line protestants and r.c.? I guess part of the answer will lie with what happens in the small grouops. Do they skate along finding the answers they like, that tickle their ears? or do those participating deepen their commitment to Christ at the same time as they establish relationships with each other?

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
Media