|
I would like to take this opportunity to officially thank the New Atheists. By “New Atheists,” I am referring to Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion), Christopher Hitchens (God Is Not Great) Sam Harris (Letter to a Christian Nation), and all the other recent atheists and agnostics who have been so viciously criticizing the Christian faith. Given that I am an evangelical Christian, you may be thinking, “Why on Earth would you want to thank them?” Let me explain.
Many of you are familiar with William Dembski, one of the leading architects for the intelligent design movement (my co-author for Understanding Intelligent Design). In 1988, he finished what he thought was his last graduate degree in mathematics from MIT. What struck him so significantly was how readily his colleagues regarded Christianity as passé. They completely dismissed it as lacking intellectual vitality and did not even consider it worth engaging. They certainly didn’t think it was dangerous and in need of eradication (as the New Atheists do). As a Christian committed to the incarnation and resurrection of Jesus, the easy dismissal of Christianity troubled him. How could they simply dismiss Christianity with hardly a second thought? Dembski decided to pursue further studies in philosophy and theology, which, of course, helped prepare him for his contribution to the ID movement. Although unheard of just a few decades ago, ID has now grown internationally and pressed Western intellectuals to seriously entertain the idea that the universe is the product of design, not chance. To be sure, many intellectuals vehemently reject Christianity. But here is the good part: they can no longer ignore it. This suggests that the naturalistic worldview that has for so long dominated Western culture is crumbling and Christianity is again on the table for discussion. The discussion is certainly not always friendly. In fact, Dawkins has become famous partly for his venomous attacks on Christianity. In The God Delusion he says the Christian God: …is arguably the most unpleasant character in all of fiction. Jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic-cleanser; a misogynistic homophobic racist, infanticidal, genodical, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully” (p. 31). Like Dawkins, many Western intellectuals now treat Christianity with open contempt. But (ironically) this is progress. The dead are no longer remembered. The living are ridiculed and despised. While the arguments of the New Atheists certainly need to be rebutted (by the way, there is nothing actually new about them except their attitude), we should be gratified by their need to refute Christianity. If Christianity was not making progress, these books would be unnecessary. Christianity is making powerful intellectual inroads, even at the highest levels of academia. We have a way to go, but things are moving in the right direction. My thanks to the New Atheists for pointing this out. |

EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS









Comments
You offer a much-needed perspective. If the opposition were silent, we wouldn't be doing our job. We need to be thankful for--and supportive of--people like William Dembski and William Lane Craig, who are willing to do the "heavy lifting" required to skilfully engage intellectuals like Dawkins and Hitchens in the faith/science debate. Not only does it take talent and dedication, but it also requires fortitude in order to withstand the "vicious" criticism.
And may I say, without trying to give you the "big head," that you are entering this arena as well with your speaking and your books. Keep at it!
Thanks, Stan. I deeply appreciate the continued encouragement!
Sean
I completely agree with Stan's comments. Please keep it up! This helps me a ton! I also have a question: I have been stduying a very elementary breakdown of quantum mechanics and how it affects religion and supports intelligent design. I would explain, but my understanding of it is very elementary, so I will spare you my weak breakdown, but the newer information and breakdowns of quantum mechanics are starting to incorporate and explain, theoretically, the metaphysical. Atheist physicists are slowing their research because these "facts" are disrupting their "beliefs". Since quantum mechanics, the theory that we are made of particles and waves, is the strongest theory we have for understanding the physics of our physical world, and I doubt they would like to make the insane attempt to create a new theory, atheist physicists appear to have just stalled their research. What do you think of this? Is it right? Don't they have an obligation as scientists first? Doesn't belaboring scientific findings, even if they are theoretical, because of how it affects what you believe or don't believe, make your belief or non-belief a religion? If it does, why don't atheists consider what they believe or don't believe a religion (I hope that made sense)? I know these are a lot of questions, but I wanted your thoughts on this. Thanks again and keep up the good work God has planned for you!
I am a creationist (former atheist) and I would say that the new atheists serve a purpose in God's plan (as does Satan). I found that once I began to engage evolutionists, I became a better debater. I had to examine their arguments to find the holes. I was surprised to see just haw many of them were completely unaware of the convulsions within evolution (being caused by evolutionists): such as the mathematical odds against a DNA strand forming in some warm pond, such as the fact that the fossil record does not show transitional forms. They blindly repeated the party line without really understanding the lack of evidence. Debating evolutionists has given me a much thicker skin, more boldness and better debating skills.