EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

Hip Hop Daddies Pt. 3

Jay Z and 50 face off after the Kanye fall out continues. Jay Z makes the comment that if 50 was stage when Kanye came up he still would’ve did the same thing because “Ain’t no one scared of 50.” This of course started a whole “battle of words” between the two artists. 50 couldn’t just sit and let Jay Z talk about him, right? 50 had to get back and protect his name, right? Or was it deeper than that? Is a man’s name all he really has? You can read that article here.

What is even more an issue here is the hyper male posturing that continues to dominate Hip Hop, but even more, give young males the idea that to “be a man” you need to call someone out. Manhood representations in Hip Hop are looked at in one of several ways:

  • Representing
  • Maintaining your own
  • Power
  • “Providing” for your woman
  • Being tough
  • Avoiding face loss


These main taxonomies of manhood are boiled down to showing out and proving your manhood in an environment where many males are trying to find their selves and their manhood. The 50 and Jay Z thing is just one example of this ongoing hyper male posturing.

But, as usual, let’s go a little deeper. Did Hip Hop start this? Did Hip Hop begin this “gender war?” I would say unequivocally no. This is something that goes deep into the social DNA and fabric of the U.S. Michael Eric Dyson states, “When you think about American society, the notion of violent masculinity is at the heart of American identity.” Hyper male posturing is seen in:

 

 

  • John Wayne Westerns where he kills the bad guy and “wins”
  • Any Rambo film
  • The cultural significance and connection of cars to manhood (e.g. the cool guy always has the cool car)
  • Dirty Harry and the Clint Eastwood construct of manhood
  •  Any Arnold Schwarzenegger film from the 80’s that deal with war
  • Chuck Norris…need I say more?
  • The ongoing film saga that illustrates men losing their entire family, then carving a path of death to “get even”
  • Old Testament renditions of God as an O.G. who kicks ass


Hip Hop does nothing but mirror an even larger problem of gender role problems that this country had long before rap music showed up!
Hyper male posturing is as American as hamburgers and French fries. These male posturing frameworks get broken down into several simple masculine traits:

  • Being tough
  • Protecting women
  • Power
  • Being the “provider”
  • Controlling you environment

Once again, it stands to reason why a cat like 50 wants to get back and let Jay Z know he ain’t no punk. Therefore, our young see this and begin to construct, from a very young age, that being a man is about being tough, getting respect at all costs, and being “real.” In HIP-HOP: Beyond Beats and Rhymes, author Kevin Powell says, “We live in a society where manhood is all about conquering and violence…. And what we don’t realize is that ultimately that kind of manhood ultimately kills you.” Add in the element of race, class, and the displacement of young urban males of color and we have a matrix of masculinity that is very complex and almost disturbing. We have some work before us, this new generation of urban males are struggling to fit in, in a world that says yo have to be one way to be a man.

My hope is that we can begin to educate a few to break away from this narrow scope of what a man “should be.”


Catch up, read Pt 1 & Pt 2 of this series...

Comments

The last line of this article states that your hope is that we can begin to educate a few to break away from this narrow scope of what a man “should be.” What do you think about the strategy of removing a young man from the neighborhood into another environment where he is not surrounded by the constant influence and reminders of male posturing to educate him about what a man should be? Do you think there is any value in getting away from it to learn? While at the same time teach others about the struggles of the streets.

Hey Rick,
Thanks for the question. Its a good one. I do think there is some value in that, but as I've found, the "mountain top" experience eventually ends and real life kicks in. What I've tried to do is work on a daily type basis in real life real time. So I'll have young men come over to the house and hang. I'll have young men go with me while I live life. I'll have young men come with me as I pick up my little girl at school and I'll have young me watch me as I cook meals. This generation is all about learning through behavior, I do think get aways and trips out the "mess" are good. They provide some great insight and help break down some of those walls. The problem is that almost every part of our society is infused with male supremacy and sexism, so it's really hard to get away from.....just some thoughts as we're processing this mess!

"The problem is that almost every part of our society is infused with male supremacy and sexism, so it's really hard to get away from.....just some thoughts as we're processing this mess!"

Why is it hard to get away from? I thought the Bible makes it perfectly clear what our roles as men are.

We're supposed to be the patriarchs God intended us to be. There must surely be a reason effeminate men are an abomination. Maybe we don't want to discuss this because it's not politically correct, but it's better to be controversial than ignore the truth.

Does patriarchy mean supremacy and sexism? Far from it. We're instructed to provide for our families and to love our women the same as Christ loves the Church. If we loved our wives with 100% unconditional love while fulfilling our roles as men, we'd find there are no problems. We'd find our wives make very fine companions and support us 100% as God intended when He created us male and female. Does Christ think He's better than the Church?

The message Jesus gives is very easy to understand- if we want to be the greatest, we will be the servants of all. This includes our wives.

The real problem isn't that the world provides a bad behavioral model. We're not to look there anyways! We're supposed to hate the world for reasons such as this!

The real problem is that the Biblical model is impossible to live unless we make material sacrifices. The reality is most people would rather send their wives off to work and their kids off to daycare so they can afford to buy their toys than to live within their means and be happy and thankful for what they have.

Scar,
Good words here....

I would just add that I"m not a fan of the traditional view of "men" in the Bible. I think most theologians got it wrong when it comes to men being the "head" of the household and yes, I do find that as a form of sexism against both men and women. The Bible has no support for men being the sole leader of one household. Moreover, there are countless stories in the Bible that use women as the head of whatever mission, family, and or story being stated.

We can try to ignore the "world" but the truth is that we can't. Not unless we want to completely disengage with society, move into a commune, or move out into the hills. The "world" will continue to influence us and shape worldviews....even our theologies. As much as we'd like to avoid that, it's just unavoidable...hence my last line in the blog.

But you are right about us wanting to avoid "life" and live that "happy life" That is something I don't think is going away anytime soon...more importantly, its something that has etched its way into church's and worldviews of God...the ATM God, or the God who will do anything for you as long as you buy the pastor a new Mercedes.....

Good "conversant" conversation though!

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
Daniel White Hodge, PhD, a Hip Hop scholar & cultural theorist focuses on race relations, film, cultural trends, and spirituality. His book, The Soul Of Hip Hop (IVP) deals with the theological gospel of Hip Hop culture & its people.


Media
Resources