I woke up this morning craving toast. I’m not sure what it was about, but I started ransacking my kitchen looking for the loaf of sourdough I just purchased from the bakery. The bread is usually right next to the toaster, but it had taken a walk today. I have been known to misplace various items, so I went about tearing into cupboards and looking on every countertop in our house. Finally, as I stared at the lonely apricot jam sitting on the counter, I picked up the phone and called my husband. “Do you know where the bread went? I swear we had a ½ of a loaf left.” He started laughing and explained that he was feeling lazy so he stuffed the rest of the bread into his work bag and the huge tub of chicken salad and thought that he would just make sandwiches at work. I cracked up, “Are you making 12 sandwiches?”
A similar apology was issued by the Senate last month about the slave trade and certain people are up in arms. One radio announcer had this to say (taken from a CNN.com article) "It's just a divisive grand-standing issue that makes no sense at all," said McDonough, a Republican radio host in Baltimore. "No. 1, I or my family have never owned slaves. We came to the United States from Ireland long after slavery had been abolished. No. 2, I think the apology has already been given in the way of 500,000 dead American soldiers in the Union Army who made it clear that they didn't approve of slavery and fought against it." "There is no need for an apology; there is a need for people to come together and work for the general welfare of the nation," he said. "The president, I believe, will pretty soon appoint a czar of apology." It’s a pretty bombastic statement if you ask me. Yes, I too am not part of a family that owned slaves, but what is wrong with the government issuing an apology for something that was indeed backed by the government? I actually think it is a fantastic idea to appoint a czar of apology. How great would it be to see people in leadership who knew when they were wrong and an office dedicated to reconciliation and making amends? I for one would be a huge fan of that. I want people to feel at home and as a nation birthed out of immigration, there needs to be more ways to be intentional about making paths (not labyrinths) for people to be citizens in this country. Last night my yoga instructor said, “There needs to be freedom in stability and stability in freedom.” And instantly my mind started pondering this idea even though she was talking about warrior pose. When we become so “stable” that we lose our freedom to move and breathe, that’s just it, we have lost our freedom. Freedom to think, freedom to make choices, and freedom period. Likewise, when our freedom is so loose that there are no structures in place or guidelines, stability is not stable. When either side takes over, as was the case with the Japanese internment camps and slavery – both were taking freedom out of consideration for the sake of stability – people were hurt and people need apologies. That’s why I want to yell at this guy who said that because when do we get to a point in our nation or even as humans when we’re too good to apologize? We might not have had a direct role in slavery, but we live in a nation where some people who have been here longer than us still don’t feel like it’s home and when our government issues an apology for their part in it, I will stand behind that. That’s good leadership. I wish the government apologized quicker than 200 years or even 45 years for the things they are doing now. We need to continually be looking at our freedom and our stability and not assume that one is more important than the other and make amends when one gets out of whack. Just like looking for the bread this morning, even if my husband’s intentions were just that, unintentional, he still apologized. He didn’t get snarky and say, “Well suck it up, I needed the bread. Let’s just work together to come up with a solution and move forward.” That wouldn’t have even acknowledged what truly happened. When we have become a people that don’t apologize, I wonder what kind of people we are becoming. Quote from: July 17, 2009 cnn.com : Obama on slavery: 'Capacity for cruelty still exists' By, Wayne Drash |

EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS







Comments
"I actually think it is a fantastic idea to appoint a czar of apology. How great would it be to see people in leadership who knew when they were wrong and an office dedicated to reconciliation and making amends? "
I like the idea for the effect it might have on every citizen in this democracy, and not just upon the people in leadership. I can imagine that such reflections would encourage self-knowledge and humility, and that these in turn would foster greater caution and care in our political actions, and greater understanding and empathy towards those around us. In my own experience, it has often been through the acknowledgment and deep regret of past wrongdoing that I've learned valuable, future-oriented lessons.
Any drawbacks?
Thanks CT for your comment. I completely agree. When the leaders of this country learn humility (and not just through getting caught with their mistress) and exemplify traits of truly working together and not just getting ahead, people could actually have politicians to look up to. We can all learn to work together better all of the time, and I don't mean that in a utopia sense, but as you mentioned for the need of greater empathy towards our neighbors.
Drawbacks? I am picturing the person who apologizes for everything constantly to the point it becomes meaningless... but I don't think in these cases if there focus on making amends and reconciliation how that could be overdone. If it was solely apologizing with no follow-up that could be a drawback. Overall, the nation's leaders have not been consistent on either end though so starting with one would be fantastic! :)
It maybe never too late to say sorry to release oneself.