Here’s the back-story (just in case you’ve been living in a media-free cave since the last weekend in March). While campaigning in Pennsylvania, Obama appeared to back a hypothetical abortion by his daughters saying he wouldn't "punish" them with a baby. Here is a transcript of his comments: "When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence education and teaching the children -- teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby." So, a baby is punishment for an unwanted pregnancy. Regrettably, I think this is a common sentiment, so I’m not intending to single out Obama. But the underlying rationale is so offensive to me that I don’t know where to begin. I’ll just give you my present stream-of-conscientiousness: Shouldn’t we recognize that there is a difference between consequences and punishment? Punishment is imposed on us by others for our alleged wrongdoing. But consequences are brought on ourselves by the choices we make. As a society, we are trying to avoid the responsibility for the consequences of our own actions. Can we dodge the consequences of our actions if we characterize them as unfair punishment? These comments make “the baby” the thing to be avoided. “The baby” is the problem. “The baby” should not take precedence over the inconvenience or preferences of the parents (especially if they are teenagers). This puts us in the position of placing degrees of value on human life. Some lives have more value than others. If we view babies as a punishment in the discussion of sex education, then it is a quick step to say that they are punishment in the discussion of unwanted pregnancy. The extension of that view takes us to valuing the lifestyle of a teenage parent (who shouldn’t be “punished”) over the value of the life of the unborn child. If a baby is a punishment to the teenage parent who conceived it, then what about other circumstances when an easily devalued life gets in our way and becomes a burden to us. This is all about how we value human life, and how that value seems to diminish if it interferes with our personal preferences. Let’s see how this attitude plays out at the other end of the age spectrum. What is the value of human life if the person is aged, decrepit, and suffers from advanced dementia. Couldn’t the care of such a person – with its concomitant financial and emotional drain – be considered a “punishment” on the adult child responsible for this elderly parent? In a few decades, I’m sure I’ll be a burden to my kids, but I don’t want them to be able to euthanize me because they claim they are being unfairly “punished” with my care. Just step away from the plug! I know I haven’t thought this issue through all the way. I’m prematurely writing this blog because my analysis is incomplete. Your comments will be appreciated to help me think through the ramifications. But I felt compelled to respond. Maybe I’m just shocked that someone finally said – in what might have been an unintentional slipup – what many people are privately thinking. Until I heard it voiced, it wasn’t so offensive to me. Now that I’ve heard the words out loud, I’m outraged. |

EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS








Comments
It is an unfortunate truth that our ability as a society to ethically think through and respond intelligently to the issues of ethics related to technology have not kept up with the results of that technology. This includes not only babies (through the availability of birth control, various fertility technologies and the care of premature infants) but also throughout life, with the issues of organ transplantation, allocation of resources, and end of life issues. As a whole, far too many of us would rather be spoon fed our response to such issues (usually through our religious affiliations) than to actually research them and then think them through. This society no longer really values life or the collective good of society as a whole. Our preoccupation with youth and "success" as well as a whole other slew of causative issues too in depth to get into here - has caused us to collectively view each individual as valuable only in as far as he/she can contribute to the welfare of whomever is making the value judgement. This is evident in such things as abortion and our lack as a society to care for those in need - the mentally ill, homeless, elderly and disabled.
Having been a critical care nurse and nurse practitioner for over 20 years I have seen that our incessant use of very expensive technology on everyone, regardless of actually usefulness of such technology to affect the eventual outcome (death) - is not actually doing many of these people any favors. We are now able to keep babies born at 22-24 weeks (term is 40 weeks) alive - but at what cost? Many of them suffer strokes, are born not fully formed, live for weeks or months on ventilators because their lungs weren't developed, and end with many physical and developmental issues to deal with their entire lives. It is said that greater than 80% of the entire medical costs of our lives are spent in the final 6 months or so - and that is generally true. It has always amazed me that we, who are Christians and believe (or are supposed to) that we are leaving this life to our real one in Heaven, are so afraid of dying. The vast majority of our technology is really useful to deal with acute illnesses or trauma (supporting a patient's life while they heal from life-threatening injuries or illness), but is used instead to prolong the dying process. And much of it is pretty darned uncomfortable. Very few lay people know what "doing everything" for their loved one really means in practical (and financial) terms. Very few medical people have any intention of allowing themselves to be kept alive on machines for any length of time at all. It is an interesting dichotomy that we do not really value life (aborting inconvenient pregnancies or using abortion as a form of birth control; putting our elderly in nursing homes; allowing our mentally ill and disabled individuals to live out on the streets because they can't take care of themselves or function in society; allowing our elderly to live in poverty where they have to choose between their medications and food or heat) yet will do anything and everything to prolong it when it is us or our loved one. This does not even begin to cover the other technologies that are available such as stem cell research or cloning.
Allocation of resources is another issue here. The cost of healthcare is skyrocketing and shows no evidence of stopping. Much of the cost goes to the high-tech end of life support and such things as organ transplantation, maintaining those on life sustaining therapies such as dialysis or ventilators, and trying to keep premature infants alive to develop. Each of these are individually based considerations. The societal considerations that are not discussed very often (that I've noticed anyway) is that resources as a whole are finite. If we are to spend $100,000 on an individual heart transplant or over a $ million to keep someone alive on life support - that means that community vaccination programs or child at risk nutrition programs or prenatal care cannot be funded because the money isn't there. If society spends the percentage of the GNP on health care as they do, other sectors of society cannot be funded. Everyone has their opinions and when it becomes an individual concern - we all generally react similarly - in our own best interest (or what we THINK is in our own best interest).
We as a society have completely disassociated the concept of responsibility or accountability with our actions. If something happens - we have to blame someone else for the outcome. If it is bad, we also want to "make them pay" often to the tune of many thousands to a million or so at a pop. Mess around without using birth control - well, yeah, pregnancy is usually the outcome (and not the absolutely worse thing that you could "catch"). Do something illegal and get caught - it's cause you weren't raised by two loving parents, or whatever. Consequences? What are consequences? In our society, if the outcome is bad, then of COURSE God is "punishing" you rather than it being a natural law of physics or of the world. God put those laws of nature and physics into place. He then told us what they were, but we never seem to grow up and listen, do we? I don't think most of us are aware of just how much our actions and thoughts impact those around us. We, as a whole, are too caught up in our selves to even notice that we have hurt someone or gotten in the way between them and God. Too often, we never grow out of that total egocentrism of the infant into a fully mature adult - not only as it pertains to our lives in the world, but also as Christians. It is that egocentrism and unawareness of our impact that drives others away, along with the fact that there are millions of Christians out there, quietly going about their daily lives, being "Jesus with skin on", but it's the lunatic fringe that get all the publicity. And all of us are painted with the brush of a few that shouldn't be let out in public without a keeper and a roll of duct tape.
How do we fix this? God can, if we will get the heck out of His way and let Him. Otherwise, I guess it is one small step at a time. Thanks for the opportunity to rant.
No problems with the rant, but I prefer to read it as a well-reasoned response. I have my own love/hate relationship with the health care system. I won't bore you with the details, but I'll say that I'm impressed with how the medical community handles acute care, but I don't think we do a very good job with chronic problems.
Bottom line is exactly what you said, and it applies to almost every area of life -- We can fix most things if we just get out of God's way -- or perhaps more precisely, if we actually get in His way and move the direction He intends.
Thanks for the thoughtful comment.
I agree with your statement logically, even if it comes off as a little self righteous. I think you also need to identify with the sinner as Jesus did, eating with sinners and tax collectors and taking their sin upon himself and paying for it. Identifying with a 13 or 14 year old girl who is pregnant as a natural consequence of her own wrong choices, may lead to an understanding of her feeling like she is being punished if she were to be required to carry a pregnancy to term and then have a baby to support and raise. Rather than outrage, it may be a more useful and Christlike response to determine how we can come along side this girl and support her through the pregnancy and place the child for adoption in a family that can support it better than the single, teenage mother. If we are separated into two camps, one that excuses sin and views the natural consequence as punishment and the other that is self righteously outraged, there is no-one left to reach out to the sinner, sacrificially, with the love of Christ, in a redemptive manner.
The North Face is a well-known climbing The North Face Denali harnesses and mountain apparel provider The North Face Outlet since early 90's North Face Sale. North Face Denali comes from the legendary Cheap North Face Jackets dinosaur Archaeopteryx Lithographic, North Face Jacket which is considered the first ptaków. North Face Denali Jacket processes that spawned the feather and the magnificence of North Face Fleece Jackets is the same evolutionary genius that North Face Reversible Jacket is trying to North Face Down Jacket used and applied to their mountain apparel Mens North Face Jackets. They provide the highest quality outdoor Womens North Face Jackets that are bound to give comfort North Face Kids and pleasure. Their breathable waterproof jackets are made from The North Face Sale the most durable GORE-TEX fabric that provides excellent durability.
A good Spyder Jacket will offer you a lot of protection from the elements. When you go skiing, you are going to be exposed to snow, which will turn to water when it lands on you.
The water may not protrude the jacket's fabric or it will cool you down. You will also be exposed to wind. The Spyder Jackets must have plenty of closure all over in order to ensure that no wind will get through and cool you down.
When you are buying women's Spyder ski Jackets you will be able to find spyder ski pants cket are very feminine. You do not have to look like a man on the slopes! If you are into fashion I know this is very important! There are many websites that offer good discounts on good looking Womens Spyder Jackets.
Ugg canada
store online provide many Ugg boots
and Ugg shoes
,with exquisite craft and high quality.the ugg boots of our Ugg boots sale
includingUGG Adirondack Short Boots,UGG Adirondack Tall Boots,UGG Bailey Button Boots,UGG Bailey Button Triplet Boots,UGG Classic Cardy Boots,
UGG Classic Mini Boots,UGG Classic Short Boots,UGG Classic Tall Boots,UGG Highkoo Boots,UGG Kids Boots,UGG Knightbridge Boots,UGG Mayfaire Boots,UGG Nightfall Boots,UGG Sundance II Boots,UGG Ultimate Bind Boots,UGG Ultimate Short Boots,UGG Ultra Short Boots,UGG Ultra Tall Boots,from
which you could choose what you like.they are all equipped with free shipping
and no tax!