My husband and I celebrated our twenty-fifth anniversary this summer, but we are not in a relationship. We were in a relationship before we got married, but as of August 13, 1983, we have not been in a relationship. We do talk to each other, and we do live in the same home. We have physical contact, and three beautiful children as evidence of that. In fact, we are deeply connected at a heart and soul level. So why the steadfast refusal to enter into a relationship with my spouse? Isn’t it a little late in the game to be thinking about getting close to each other? The reason is that people in a relationship stay together or move apart, based on how they are relating to each other; while people who are married stay together or move apart based on mutual legally documented promises made at the wedding, and their discernment as to whether those promises are being kept, have been broken with hope of repair, or have been irrevocably broken. In a marriage, the promises are the primary foundation, and in a relationship, the quality of relating is the primary foundation. In a marriage, the promises to love , honor and be faithful are clearly verbalized in front of at least one witness. There is a legal document, a marriage certificate or marriage license, entitling both parties to particular rights and priviledges, based on the public promises. There are distinct barriers to ending a marriage, and there is usually an acknowledgement that this a change from the original plan to stay married until one of the spouses dies. By contract, in a relationship, if there are promises made, they are usually made in private, and undocumented. There is usually a tacit understanding that it would be perfectly reasonable, although probably very painful, for one or the other partner in the relationship to renegotiate the time frame for those promises. Because they have different foundations, relationships and marriages have different root causes underlying the ir issues, and different solution paths to those issues. Most of my married clients have told me that they want to work through the problems in their “relationship”. Perhaps this choice of wording reflects the wish for escape that married people sometimes experience during conflict. Spouses in conflict sometimes wish there were an easy way out of the marriage, as there was back when they were in a relationship. In most cases, the use of the term “relationship” is more likely being used by clients who have adopted the current cultural norm of referring to any two people who are a couple as being in a “relationship.” Part of my work with couples is helping clients to properly identify the context, - a marriage or a relationship - before looking for root causes and solution paths. It is important during conflicts, when one is bored, or even when things are going really well with one’s significant other, to reflect on which type of couple one is in – a relationship or a marriage. Neither type of couple is, in itself, better or superior to the other. However, there are healthy behaviors and goals for each type of couple that are distinct. Both types deserve to be affirmed, but the tricky part is in not losing the distinctives of each type in the process. To use an example from my clinical experience, let’s say I am seeing two couples. One is Adam and Betty, who are living together with the possibility of becoming engaged being open-ended. The other is Charles and Dorcas, who are married. Both have the presenting problem that they feel that they have different goals, and they want to do better with this. With Adam and Betty, I will help them to develop skills for better understanding of the other person’s world and experience, and have each of them find out how welcome they would be if they participated more in the other’s activities of interest. The root cause is lack of knowledge. If one of them has trouble supporting the other’s activities, or is not comfortable participating with the other or letting the other participate, that tells them a lot about whether they would enjoy being married to each other. With Charles and Dorcas, I would review the same skills that Adam and Betty worked on, and find out if there was a time in their marriage when such participation and mutual support was easy for them to maintain. The root cause here is probably time pressure, combined with new responsibilities. If they Charles and Dorcas can re-establish the habits of mutual support and participation, they can experience their marriage commitment at a deeper level. Happily married couples report that it’s not enough just to have a supportive attitude, they want to be an integral part of their spouse’s success. Remarkably, they want to support their spouse even when the spouse fails. In other words, it’s not enough for the spouse to be a success or to enjoy an activity. “Your happiness” becomes “our happiness”. “Your passion” becomes “our passion”. “Your setback” becomes “our setback.” What I call The Story of Us becomes a strength for the good times and a source of energy in the bad times. (If another therapist has already coined this phrase, then my apologies to them. I will be happy to cite previous sources if made available.) When a dating couple mutually notice that they are starting to develop The Story of Us, they begin to look towards marriage. When Mako and I were in our relationship, at some point I realized that it wouldn’t be enough for me to attend his art exhibits and to know that good things were happening in his career. I wanted to be participate in his interests, and be an integral part of his success. Believe me, I do not have the skills to help out in the studio. I have participated in other ways. He realized, at some point, that it wasn’t good enough that I had this great thing called faith in Christ that inspired my life and work. He felt the urge to investigate the claims of Christ personally. The Story of Us requires that both partners not only desire to be committed to each other, but that they be willing to possibly undergo some personal change and growth in the process. When a husband joyfully announces “We’re pregnant” or a wife confides, “We got laid off from his job this year”, it demonstrates The Story of Us is being written for those couples. Whether two people are in a relationship or a marriage, there is much to be enjoyed and much to learn. They may be getting to know, they may have supported each other emotionally for a long time, or they may have already written many chapters together in The Story of Us. Marriages and relationships both can be celebrated. Which kind of couple are you? |

EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS







My husband and I celebrated our twenty-fifth anniversary this summer, but we are not in a relationship. We were in a relationship before we got married, but as of August 13, 1983, we have not been in a relationship. We do talk to each other, and we do live in the same home. We have physical contact, and three beautiful children as evidence of that. In fact, we are deeply connected at a heart and soul level. So why the steadfast refusal to enter into a relationship with my spouse? Isn’t it a little late in the game to be thinking about getting close to each other? The reason is that people in a relationship stay together or move apart, based on how they are relating to each other; while people who are married stay together or move apart based on mutual legally documented promises made at the wedding, and their discernment as to whether those promises are being kept, have been broken with hope of repair, or have been irrevocably broken.
To use an example from my clinical experience, let’s say I am seeing two couples. One is Adam and Betty, who are living together with the possibility of becoming engaged being open-ended. The other is Charles and Dorcas, who are married. Both have the presenting problem that they feel that they have different goals, and they want to do better with this. With Adam and Betty, I will help them to develop skills for better understanding of the other person’s world and experience, and have each of them find out how welcome they would be if they participated more in the other’s activities of interest. The root cause is lack of knowledge. If one of them has trouble supporting the other’s activities, or is not comfortable participating with the other or letting the other participate, that tells them a lot about whether they would enjoy being married to each other. With Charles and Dorcas, I would review the same skills that Adam and Betty worked on, and find out if there was a time in their marriage when such participation and mutual support was easy for them to maintain. The root cause here is probably time pressure, combined with new responsibilities. If they Charles and Dorcas can re-establish the habits of mutual support and participation, they can experience their marriage commitment at a deeper level.
Comments
This is a very good post.