EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

The Crowning of His Own Gracious Gifts: A Response About Faith and Works

This is a response to a comment that TAMB left to my last blog; which itself was a response to a recent article by Brett.  I think TAMB's arguments are good so I wanted to let them have their own space here on my page; especially because of the feedback I got about my previous post.  I know this kind of thing is difficult to read and there are probably 5 of you who are interested in discussions like this, so I ask for your patience.  I hope it helps sort some things out in your mind.  I will put TAMB's comments between arrows and mine in bold type.

TAMB,

Nice to see you back!  I really wish you'd blog more.  I miss reading your eloquent and insightful posts.  There are few people I respect more than you so I hope I do your questions justice here.  


<<I take it their view is that the cross is behind us, so to speak: we've *already* been saved from our sins. Our task is no longer to repent and receive the merit that Christ earned. We've already done that. Our job now is to do the good works that God prepared in advance for us to do (Ephesians 2:10). This all seems perfectly biblical, so I'm wondering if you really disagree.>>

<<Maybe that's because they're already preaching to the converted? People who have received Jesus don't need a sermon telling them to receive Jesus. People who have already accepted Christ's work on the cross don't need to be told to accept Christ's work on the cross. No, these Christians need to be told to DO SOMETHING, to do the good works that God prepared in advance for us to do.>>

First, I disagree that you can assume that Christians in church don't need to hear about the cross or what God did for us through Jesus.  When studies show that a large amount of *professing Christians* don't believe in a hell, don't believe that Jesus is the only way of salvation, believe that Jesus sinned while on earth, and don't believe the Bible is accurate in what it teaches, we cannot even begin to assume that the people in the pews (or who are reading Christian books) are all Christians.  

Even for those who DO believe in an orthodox Christianity, they need to be reminded of who God is and what He has done in Christ.  Do you serve your wife better when you are dryly doing things for her because you were told to, or do you serve her better when your affections are stirred for her by all of the wonderful things she is as a person and what she has done/does for you?  The human heart is one that will always try to usurp God from His throne, whether through legalism or license, and the Gospel is what humbles us and reminds us of who God is, who we were, and what He has done to make us who we are now.

This is how God did it with the Israelites and how Paul did it with the early churches.  God gave Israel commands AFTER acting on their behalf and delivering them.  Throughout the Old Testament, when God would levee charges against Israel for their unfaithfulness or give them commands, it was often with either "I am the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob" (reminding them of His covenant faithfulness) or "I am the God who brought you out of Egypt" (reminding them of His faithful deliverance).

When Paul wrote to churches in the New Testament - presumably to Christians who had already been saved and who needed 'to be told to do something' - he commonly did so AFTER reminding them of who God was and what He did in Jesus.  Romans 12 comes after chapters 1-11, Galatians 5 and 6 come after 1-4, Ephesians 4 comes after 1-3 and so on.

The cross is never behind us, but always before us.  It is the indicatives that ignite the imperatives.


<<I don't see why that transition is inevitable. Surely someone can (and should) consistently believe that Christ has done us an immeasurable service, while also desiring to live well, be sanctified, and do Christ's good works here on Earth. That's what Paul taught. NT Wright isn't into works-based justification in the sense you mean it. I think it's pretty unfair to accuse him of that.>>

I'm not saying we shouldn't live godly lives, but that the godly lives are a result of our justification.  You're combining sanctification with justification (as Catholics do).  To my best understanding Wright believes in an initial justification which begins the process of sanctification, and a final justification that is contingent on our sanctification.

Is what Christ did for us immeasurable or complete and sufficient?  Is it all that we need to be reconciled to God?  

If it's not, and we add to it, then we are introducing our works into our justification before God.


<<And in fact, as I've pointed out to you several times, the Bible clearly teaches that we will be rewarded or punished on judgment day ON THE BASIS OF OUR WORKS. Here's just one example: 2 Corinthians 5:10 tells us that before the judgment seat of Christ we will receive *what is due to us* for what we have DONE...

You characterize Wright's view as leading to the following conclusion:
>>When you finally stand before God, you are saved by what you have done rather than what God in Jesus has done for you.>>

Later, you say:
>>Wright's view is that there is a final justification where your deeds will play into whether you are saved or not.>>

But isn't that exactly what the Bible teaches?

-- Revelation 20:12-15 tells us the dead will be judged according to what they had DONE.
-- Matthew 25:31-46 tells us Jesus will separate the sheep from the goats on the basis of what they have DONE.
-- Romans 2:6 tells us "God will give to each person according to what he has DONE."
-- Romans 2:8-11 tells us eternal life will be given to those who DO good.
-- Romans 8:13 says that if we put to death the misDEEDS of the body, we will live.
-- Galatians 6:7-9 says that a man reaps as he sows, i.e. according to what he DOES.

Your view seems to be at variance with the Bible, while Wright's view seems to be in concordance with the Bible. Given your commitment to the Bible, I think you should adopt Wright's view.>>>

These are all good questions but no, that is not exactly what the Bible teaches.

--Rev 20:12.  Yes, the dead are judged for what they had done.  A horrible fact for all of those who are outside of Jesus and can't rely on Him and what He has done when it comes time to stand before God.

--Matt. 25:31-46.  Here is the first problem, if we stick to the surface reading as you just did and claim that God will judge us based on what we have done, we have to ask ourselves, "How are we doing on feeding the hungry, giving water to the thirsty, clothing the naked, welcoming the stranger, and visiting the prisoner?"  My guess is that, as mine do, your sins outweigh those deeds.  Even if you claim it's a parable, then what are the criteria for good deeds that we must do to be sure that we are put at His right hand?  And what's the passing grade?  How many good deeds is enough?  Those are all rhetorical questions of course.

[I hope you can see how a works-based justification leads to legalism and pride.  If you're doing "better" than someone else, then you feel superior to them.  If you're going "good" in your life, and God has to reward you for that, then He owes you.  As opposed to the classic Protestant view that we are all equally depraved sinners in need of grace (Rom. 1-3).]

I think your emphasis on good works can be handled with a closer examination of the passage.  Jesus is talking here of an inheritance.  Who inherits but heirs?  It requires a familial relationship.  How are believers adopted into the family of God and how do they receive that inheritance?

a) It's only through Jesus that we go to the Father. (John 14:6)
b) How do we come to Jesus?  The Father draws us to Him. (John 6:44)
c) How does the Father draw us?  By the Holy Spirit. (John 15:26)
d) What does the Holy Spirit do?  Regenerate us and give us faith. (John 3:5-8)
e) What does that faith do? Justifies us before God, gives us peace with Him, and reconciles us to Him by removing our sin and guilt. (Romans 5, Romans 3:25, 26; Romans 3:28; Galatians 2:16; Galatians 3:8)
f) What does that justification, peace with God, bring with it?  Because we are then alive in Christ, we are considered sons of God and heirs of His promises. (Titus 3:3-7; Galatians 4:4-7)
g) How do we know that we can be sure of our inheritance?  Because when through faith we were sealed with the Holy Spirit, who is the guarantee of our inheritance. (Ephesians 1:13,14)

It is BECAUSE of all of those things and BY the Holy Spirit that we are to continue living by the Spirit and showing fruits of the Spirit (Romans 8, Galatians 5).  I would pose the question that Paul asked the Galatians to you as well: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?  In the same way, if you are a Christian, you have been justified.

It is living a Spirit-enabled, worshipful, godly life of grateful obedience and service that flows from a response to all God has done that flows from a true Christian.  Notice how the sheep were all shocked. (Matt. 25:37,38)  They weren't living godly lives in anticipation of God weighing their deeds one day.  

Faith alone saves, but saving faith is never alone.  It bears fruit.

Now to your use of Scripture to say that we are judged on our works.

--Romans 2:6 and Romans 2:8-11.  Romans 2 is directed at judgmental Jews (v.1).  Jews who thought they were 'righteous' because of their heritage, and the Gentiles were 'sinners' because they were outside of Israel.  This section is Paul rebuking the Jews, and is followed by the conclusion to his opening argument (chaps 1-3) where he says that what has been revealed in the Gospel is "the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe.  For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith." (vs.22-25)  He is showing the legalistic Jews and the licentious Gentiles that they both, we all, need a Savior.

--Romans 8:13.  Romans 8 is Paul talking about sanctification and not justification.  In chapters 1-3 he lays out the sin of mankind and our need for a Savior and tells us we are justified, saved, by faith.  In chapter 4, Paul uses the story of Abraham to illustrate how we are saved by faith, as he was.  Chapters 5-7 are about, because of Jesus' death on the cross, we are saved from slavery to sin, death, and the law.  Chapter 8 is about living in the Spirit.  Since it doesn't have to do with how we are saved, but rather how we are to live as Christians, I'll proceed to the next verse you gave.

--Galatians 6:7-9.  Again, this is coming in the section of the letter in which Paul is talking about how Christians are to live in response to their salvation (chaps 3-4), NOT about how to be saved.


In conclusion, I would encourage you to embrace the incredible freedom and grace in the Biblical truth that we are justified by faith in Jesus Christ alone.



<<But why is there any doubt here? The Bible clearly teaches that we will be judged on the basis of what we have DONE. Doesn't it?>>

I think I just showed that it doesn't.  When in doubt, side with Grace.


<<In Philippians 1, Paul tells us that he is "confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus." God glorifies all those he sanctifies, and sanctifies all those he justifies. If you were justified, you'll eventually be glorified. You can rest assured in that, while still believing that sanctification (and therefore glorification) requires that you do good works (not works of the Law, "works of love").>>

You came close to sounding Reformed there.  I like it.  You can see that in your own words, it is God who does the work - who begins and completes - and that it begins with justification, continues into sanctification, and comes to full flower in glorification.  The amazing truths and benefits of justification (completed and accomplished for us) and the hope of glorification gives us endurance - along with the Holy Spirit - to persevere in sanctification.

I think J.I. Packer describes the tie between works and rewards very well.  "Though the believer's works do not merit salvation and always have something imperfect about them (Rom. 7:13-20; Gal. 5:17), in their character as expressions of the love and fidelity that faith calls forth they are the basis on which God promises rewards in heaven (Phil. 3:12-14; 2 Tim. 4:7-8).  For God thus to reward us according to our works is, as Augustine noted, His gracious crowing of His own gracious gifts."

It makes me think of a verse from one of my favorite hymns.

"Praise to the Lord, who o’er all things so wondrously reigneth,

Shelters thee under His wings, yea, so gently sustaineth! 


Hast thou not seen

How thy desires e’er have been


Granted in what He ordaineth?"

He ordains and He grants.  He begins and He completes.  

Comments

At the beginning of your post I thought perhaps there was just a semantics problem between your point of view and TAMB's. You seemed to be addressing the need to preach the cross, atonement and grace to those in the pew, and TAMB seemed to be saying that that we should be preaching "works" to those who are already true Christians. There need be no contradiction if many in the pew are not true Christians. However, as I read on I realized that there is more daylight between your two positions than I realized at first.
I would only add that preaching the cross, atonement and grace to those who are already saved gives us motivation for good works. Our good works should be done out of profound gratitude for what has already been done for us. The Christian whose heart is not still moved by Christ on the cross and risen from the dead is in danger of stagnating in a life of spiritual inactivity. S/he should probably examine him/herself to know whether s/he has really been saved. How strange it would be to not be forever grateful to one who saved my life here on earth, let alone to one who has not only saved me here on earth and also in the life to come--and one who continually saves me and forgives me of sins since my original salvation experience, sins that of themselves would condemn me to hell if it were not for his ongoing grace.
doc

Hey Doc,

I'm in complete agreement with you that our good works are done out of profound gratitude for what has already been done for us and that is the precise reason why Christians need to dwell on the cross and it's incredible, abundant truths. Thank you for often saying in few words what I pour out in a torrent.

Nick

Hi Nick,

I said:
>>People who have received Jesus don't need a sermon telling them to receive Jesus. People who have already accepted Christ's work on the cross don't need to be told to accept Christ's work on the cross. No, these Christians need to be told to DO SOMETHING, to do the good works that God prepared in advance for us to do.>>

You replied:
>>First, I disagree that you can assume that Christians in church don't need to hear about the cross or what God did for us through Jesus.>>

I didn’t assume that (please reread my quote above). But you’re right, it’s not an either-or deal. Maybe what pastors should do is (i) give a healthy dose of teaching on the cross and justification, both to ensure that the congregation holds orthodox beliefs and to motivate them to do good works, as well as (ii) exhort their congregation to do good works. That’s what Paul did in his letters, as you point out.

Has NT Wright (or Brett) ever said otherwise? I bet you all agree, at the end of the day.

You also said:
>>To my best understanding Wright believes in an initial justification which begins the process of sanctification, and a final justification that is contingent on our sanctification.>>

That sounds about right to me. I think Jesus, James, and Paul all taught that as well.

>>Is what Christ did for us immeasurable or complete and sufficient? Is it all that we need to be reconciled to God?>>

Christ’s work is BOTH immeasurable AND complete and sufficient. It completely and sufficiently atoned for our sins. Christ’s work erased an immeasurable debt. We’re now no longer in God’s debt. If that’s what you mean by being “reconciled to God,” then yes, Christ’s work is all we need to be reconciled to God.

But the Bible teaches that there is much more to life in the kingdom of God than just having our debt erased, than just being free from prison. We were saved from the debt of our sins for a purpose: to be sanctified and glorified. And the Bible clearly teaches that the process of sanctification requires that we DO stuff.

So if by “reconciled to God” you mean sanctified and glorified, then no, Christ’s work here on Earth 2000ish years ago isn’t all we need for that. If Christ’s work here on Earth 2000 years ago had been sufficient for that, we would already be sanctified and glorified. But we aren’t, so it wasn’t. But it wasn’t meant to be. Christ just came to make atonement for our sins, to give his life as a ransom for many. He sent the Holy Spirit for stage two: the regeneration and sanctification of all believers. Then, when that work is completed, the Father will glorify us. The whole Trinity gets into the process of salvation, on my view.

I said:
>>the Bible clearly teaches that we will be rewarded or punished on judgment day ON THE BASIS OF OUR WORKS.>>

And I gave a lot of examples of this.

You replied:
>> no, that is not exactly what the Bible teaches.>>

About Rev 20:12 you said:
>>Yes, the dead are judged for what they had done. A horrible fact for all of those who are outside of Jesus and can't rely on Him and what He has done when it comes time to stand before God.>>

Well, I’m confused here. I said that the Bible teaches that we will be judged for what we have done. You said that the Bible doesn’t teach that. But then you seem to agree that in Revelation, “the dead are judged for what they had done.”

So it looks like we agree. The Bible teaches that we will be judged for what we have done.

About Matt. 25:31-46, you said:
>>Here is the first problem, if we stick to the surface reading as you just did and claim that God will judge us based on what we have done, we have to ask ourselves, "How are we doing on feeding the hungry, giving water to the thirsty, clothing the naked, welcoming the stranger, and visiting the prisoner?" My guess is that, as mine do, your sins outweigh those deeds.>>

I take it that by calling this a “surface” reading, you agree that the natural interpretation of the text is that, on Judgment Day, Jesus will welcome some people into heaven, saying “Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat…”

Notice the “for” there. Jesus clearly tells us WHY people will be let into heaven: because of what they have done. And similarly with people who are not let into heaven: “Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat…”

Again, notice the “for”: Jesus explicitly tells us the reason why these people will be sent to the eternal fire, namely that they failed to do good works. Those are the words of Jesus, and I think we should accept the natural interpretation. If the natural interpretation conflicts with our theology or our expectations, so much the worse for our theology and our expectations.

If your view were right, we would expect Jesus to say "Come into heaven, FOR you have had faith." But he didn't say that. So this verse is evidence against your view.

>>Even if you claim it's a parable, then what are the criteria for good deeds that we must do to be sure that we are put at His right hand? And what's the passing grade? How many good deeds is enough? >>

I have no idea. Why is that a problem for my view? Why should I expect to be able to answer such questions? The Bible doesn’t divulge that information. All it tells us (clearly and repeatedly) is that we will be judged for what we have DONE.

>>I hope you can see how a works-based justification leads to legalism and pride.>>

Not necessarily. Of course some people may make these errors. But on the other side, some people who accept your view may slip into fatalism and complacency. Is that the fault of your theology, or of those people? Clearly the latter. But then the same goes for people on my side who fall into pride and legalism.

>>If you're going "good" in your life, and God has to reward you for that, then He owes you.>>

Sure, that’s called “justice.” But remember that orthodox Catholicism teaches that all our good works depend on God’s grace. Without God’s cooperation, sanctification would be impossible. So we shouldn’t get all puffed up when we do good works.

>>As opposed to the classic Protestant view that we are all equally depraved sinners in need of grace (Rom. 1-3).>>

That’s also the classic Catholic view. Come home to Rome.

>>Jesus is talking here of an inheritance…>>

Um, maybe. But he also makes it crystal clear that we will be judged for what we have DONE, and he even tells us the sort of deeds he has in mind: feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, etc. Your theology should come to grips with this clear Biblical datum. So far, it looks like you’re trying to ignore or reinterpret (in really implausible ways) the clear Biblical teaching.

In Matthew 25, Jesus clearly welcomes people into heaven FOR the good works they did, and condemns people to hell FOR the good works they didn’t do. That’s a piece of data. As far as I can tell, your theology cannot explain this datum.

>> I would pose the question that Paul asked the Galatians to you as well: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?>>

By hearing with faith, of course.

>>In the same way, if you are a Christian, you have been justified.>>

Catholics accept that faith is sufficient for “first justification.” NT Wright seems to accept that as well. But according to James 2:24 (“So you see a man is justified by what he does, and not by faith alone.”) there is some other legitimate sense of “justification” that requires us to DO stuff.

In *this* sense of “justification,” it’s false that “If you are a Christian, you have been justified.” In this second sense, the sense which James uses, we Christians are still being justified.

>>Notice how the sheep were all shocked. (Matt. 25:37,38) They weren't living godly lives in anticipation of God weighing their deeds one day.>>

Um, the sheep go on to tell us why they are shocked, in verses 37-39: they are shocked because Jesus said that they had clothed *him*. They were unaware that they had ever clothed Jesus. Jesus explains: “I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.”

That’s why they’re shocked. They’re NOT shocked because they were judged on the basis of their deeds. So this is actually more evidence for my view.

>>Faith alone saves>>

The Bible never says this. In fact, James 2:24 says exactly the opposite.

>>You came close to sounding Reformed there. I like it.>>

Um, maybe it’s the Reformed who come close to sounding Catholic there. And maybe what you actually like is Catholicism. ;-)

Here's my two cents, I don't have time to back it up with a bunch of scriptures or anything, but wanted to throw in what I feel.

We're nothing with the cross, we need to remember that, I believe Jesus wants us to remember what He did for us, but maybe not in the way many people want us to believe. Works don't save us, but there are good works planned out for our lives after we are redeemed and have justification through the cross, well, through Jesus. I know a lot of scripture says "the cross" but it's Jesus who's done it all.

I would like to believe that Jesus died on the cross for us out of love and while he wants us to remember that it in a remembrance of love, not that we're nothing without it. We know we're nothing without the cross but in my opinion too many pastors try to just keep convincing people of this more than focusing on why Jesus did this and how we should now live.

Did Jesus die on the cross so we would receive a message of doom and gloom that we're nothing without him dying on the cross? No, he died on the cross so we would have freedom and eternal life with him. Having been preached to many times that I'm a horrid dirty ugly sinner that is worth nothing without the cross is one of the things that really turns me off to religion. I know this fact is important, but I don't envision Jesus standing there saying I need to remember how lost I am without him and that I am nothing without him dying on the cross, I see him saying "I loved you so much I died for you, now go and live all the amazing things I have prepared for you, and never forget the love I have for you (dying for you."

We are nothing without Christ, but I don't think Christians need to live under this burden that we're horrible sinners worth nothing without the cross. Jesus died to free us, not put us under a burden.

As for the works. Our works will never cover our sins, but living them is what God asks us to do. We are redeemed and now are to live a life of worshiping him in all we do and say. There's not a list of works that are better than others because each of our callings are unique and perfect in what God has prepared for us. (can we say Ephesians?)

So... if any of this makes sense that'd be good. I guess in conclusion I would say that our works don't save us, the cross does, but the cross should never be used as a reminder of what horrid sinners we are and worth nothing without it, but instead a reminder of the love and freedom that Jesus has given us and that with him we can live all these works that he has planned out for us. And when we come before the thrown we will bring into account what we have done, not for our salvation, but in how we took the calling God gave us and lived it with all our hearts.

My two cents.

Scripture seems to clearly teach that we are pretty awful without the cross (which is used as a metaphor for Jesus' atoning suffering and death, similarly sometimes we say we are redeemed by the "blood of Jesus," again taking one item from the total experience and using it to represent the entire event, and there is one verse that refers to the "blood of the cross" in the same way).
What deserves equal attention is how great we are with the cross. It is natural for the redeemed person to manifest the fruit of the Spirit.
How to communicate these truths can be problematic. I can feel the depth of my depravity and know without a doubt that I was a worm without Christ, but to preach that to someone who is still without Christ may "turn them off to religion." We need to meet people where their felt need is and minister to that need in the name of Christ. Christ will meet them and gently relieve them of their burdens if they accept his "yoke," which by comparison is easy and light.
While Jesus associated with sinners and offered reconciliation to God, he also preached that those who refuse their invitation to come to the wedding feast of the Son will be cast into outer darkness where there will be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth (because that is what they deserve without the cross).

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
Now: Director PR/Media Relations at Mars Hill Church in Seattle. Then: Spent my first year and a half of marriage in Mongolia. Before: Ten years in the music industry. For more of the story, see my "About Me" page.