EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

She's a Pastor

Last night, one my closest friends officially became a pastor.

  The elders, pastors, and leaders of our church were on hand to ordain Lynne and testify in public that she had gone above and beyond all the requirements necessary to earn the title. She has faithfully run our missions programs for 7 years, mentored countless people, taught classes and Bible studies, and, oh yeah, she just completed her Doctorate degree. 

In truth, Lynne has been one of the most caring, qualified, passionate pastors I have ever met, for the last 25 years. Working in a variety of ministry settings, she has consistently labored to show people Jesus, to bring freedom from oppression and justice to the poor. She has sat in meetings, often the only woman present, and used her God given gifts of leadership in spite of the belief of some that women shouldn’t have a place at the table.

  Nothing much will change about the way she ministers, now that the name plaque on her door can officially read “Pastor Lynne Ellis.” She’s always given it her all, regardless of the fact that the title was previously unavailable to her simply because of her gender. She ministered with passion and a fierce love of Jesus Christ because she understood that the calling on her life was from God, whether validated by an institution or not.

But, last night, with scores of friends, family, and church members in attendance, Lynne’s years of service were validated. My husband is the Lead Pastor at our church and, as he prayed over her, I wept.  I wept because I was proud of my friend. I wept for the young women watching who witnessed a ceiling being blasted out of their lives.  I wept for the old women watching who, while sighing deeply, had something healed in their hearts. And , I wept because I’m proud of my husband, who strongly, publicly, believes in women in leadership in the church.

My daughter (9) and Lynne’s daughter (4) sat together watching the service and cheering for Lynne. The girls stared up at Lynne, faces proud and smiling, totally unaware of what an historic day they were witnessing.  To them, Lynne has always been a pastor.  My son, Caleb, took in the scene as well, asking, “Mom, why are you crying?” I responded,  “Because, buddy, I think Lynne does a really good job.”  “Oh,” he said. “Cool.”

Lynne’s ordination is an important milestone for her but even more so for women in general. Her ordination repeals a cultural limitation and announces that women are valuable, that they can be leaders, and that God uses them in powerful ways. It also counters some misguided theology of several churches in our community here in the Northwest.

One male leader in particular frequently clarifies that the target of their ministries, the very reason they exist, is to reach lost men. He rails against a “chickified” church and insists Jesus would have spent his Saturdays watching football and drinking beer. I understand that men in Seattle need Jesus. I get it. 

But, so do women.

As a woman who happened to be born with leadership skills, I feel hurt by this rhetoric, excluded and marginalized by it. It pains me to realize that in this particular church community, my gifts would not be valued or utilized to their fullest extent.

With Lynne’s ordination, I believe the message both men and women in our congregation and in the larger community will receive is this: There is a place for women at the table. Women are an essential part of our target audience. Jesus died for them, saves them, and empowers them with his Spirit to change the world. No ceilings. No limitations. Only freedom.

 

Mike read the following quotation from John Stott, an esteemed Christian theologian, during the ordination. "If God allows women with spiritual gifts (which he does), and thereby calls them to exercise their gifts for the common good (which he does), then the church must recognize God's gifts and calling, must make appropriate spheres of service available to women, and should 'ordain' (that is, commission and authorize) them to exercise their God-given ministry...Our Christian doctrines of creation and redemption tell us that God wants his gifted people to be fulfilled not frustrated, and his church to be enriched by their service."

Suffice it to say that I'm more than stoked to be part of Overlake Christian Church.

 

 So, Lynne, I’m proud to call you my friend and even prouder to call you my pastor. Thank you for hanging in there and seeing this through. Thanks for inspiring my daughter, who I believe might just be President one day. :)

Comments

I can't help but want to cry out of joy with you.

What does a Christian woman with strong leadership skills do? Single for life? Only allowed to work in leadership with children? Only allowed to share her testimony at women's retreats? Faithful receptionist? Singer? Potluck coordinator.

Board membership, public speaking to a mixed congregation, professional counselor, theologian, writer, politician...these leadership skills are not usually esteemed for christian women.

This issue is not limited to the Northwest. I'm glad to know there are some examples of Godly men who value women in leadership. Thank you for your post.

Women pastors are not scriptural. I’m sorry if you may take offense at this, but it just means that it is God’s plan to have it this way; Paul makes this very clear. Therefore, there is a very specific reason for doing so; Paul also explains this. It does not matter how deserving a woman is, or how emotional you feel about it. If God has a plan you stick to it. It’s not a matter of what we think.
Everything you said in your blog was a tribute to your friend, and God was nowhere in sight. Why? Also, everything else was all about women, as well as your friend, finally getting what they deserve in the church. Why? To be point blank, you, and I deserve to be eternally separated from God. We deserve nothing more than God’s wrath. The only thing between us and hell is the blood of Christ not our credentials, our efforts, or works.

By now you have probably pigeon holed me as a male who thinks women are to always be submissive to their husbands, never speak in church, and that I have an attitude about the role of women in the church. Well, you would be wrong on a couple of those points.
It is really simple, I believe that what the bible says is what we are supposed to obey. Just because it does not set right with you is not a reason to change the scriptures to fit your “new” thinking. I mean, the scriptures have been around and studied for two thousand years and you now think you have stumbled upon “the right” interpretation that has either gone un-noticed, or purposely hidden by the male dominated clergy? Listen, we have enough of that coming at us from the left with the surfacing of the Emerging Church. Your blog oosed pride, human pride, scripture changing pride, the kind that does nothing for the kingdom.

The problem of women pastors in the pulpit today comes largely out of the women’s movement in the 1970’s. This whole “women’s rights”, “being equal to men”, thing. It was also a natural platform for the feminists (who are atheistic at their core) to lash out against the church as a whole. Now, in addition to this, those who are not feminists, or Christians, also heard this protest and join the cry by spreading the message that “God is unjust”, “He’s a woman hater”, “the church is male dominated” and therefore “chauvinistic in nature”. It is all designed by Satan to disrupt the flow of the body.

Remember…. The cross is an offense to those who are dead spiritually.

All of those who are spiritually dead want to see the church destroyed. Why? So they can finally justify their sin as an irrelevant issue. Distroying the bible, and making the church as not creditable goes a long way towards this goal.

On a personal level, women have to accept whatever role God has planed for them as God given way of doing things. I’m sorry, but if there is an issue it needs to be taken up with God. He sets the agenda.

Don’t forget, we are human and will eventually screw things up to our detriment. And at this moment we are doing a pretty good job of messing up the church on our own without any help from the outside; and this is a good example as well as the acceptance of homosexuality.

Just because a church, or denomination appoints women pastors does not mean that it is alright with God. It just means that they have given into the public cry against the church and have done something to lower the volumn.

Women started the issue, and for the most part are keeping the cry front and center. Of course there are men involved, but women are at its base. Eve took control and deceived her husband. Like it, or not, her actions in the garden forever doomed her to a second place submissive role. And this is not me giving my opinion, just read the story of the fall, again, and again until it finly sinks in what her actions cost all the women who were to come after her. Eve's pride, and her statement, "surly God has not said.." is a spiritually dead flaw of the sin nature. Maybe God wants to take it out of play.
Personally, and I am not directing this at you, I’m just glad that God chose me to be his child. For me this is beyond my understanding which negates me from explaining God outside of what scripture says. Therefore, God can run the show any way He wants.
DLStokes

Just a few comments.

We are in agreement, God can run the show anyway He wants.

We are in agreement that we're all condemned to hell, only saved by God's grace. Men and women. I'm not sure you understood the premise for this post. You're off point completely. That's a cop out argument that anyone could use about any compliment to anyone. You're post wreaks of reverse pride.

Are you in disagreement that Lynne was ordained, or that she was actively involved in ministry for 25 years?

I didn't get the impression that Lynne was usurping any man in leadership, nor did I get the impression that Lynne felt that men were dominant, that God was unjust or that she was lashing out. I don't think you read the post.

We are also in agreement that we are human and will eventually screw things up to our detriment. I think we disagree on who's doing the screwing up.

Lastly, you owe the author of this post an apology for insinuating that the cross is offensive therefore she is spiritually dead.

Bluediamond,

Wow! I can tell that you are a bit irritated over my post, so let’s take your remarks one at a time. Also I will try to be careful with my words as not to insinuate something other then what I mean. I would like to start with the most serious of your accusations.
1. “insinuating that the cross is offensive therefore she is spiritually dead.”
I am not quite sure how you came to that conclusion regarding this. For that I am sorry you did. In fact the cross “is” offensive to those who are dead to God. Actually, my remark was a simple paraphrase of 1 Cor. 1:18: “For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” (ref: Rom 9:32-33; 1 Cor. 1:23) My use of the verse was to emphasize the motivation behind the feminist outrage against the church. This statement was not directed at Jodie Howerton. I seriously doubt that she, or her husband are among those who are in that category.

Now, I ask you. Did you not read my post in the sequential order it was written? My paraphrase came after the paragraph where I gave a basic background of the Feminist attack on the true Church, the body of Christ, and why they were doing it. Further, this crusade of equality is so broad it has slowly worked its way into our churches to the point where we, in some cases, start to doubt Gods word and begin to change theology. (which was another of my points)

After this paragraph I concluded with the reason they are really attacking the church with this issue of equality. “They” not Jodie, are spiritually dead and hate God, as well as Christ and the cross. It is offensive, foolishness, folly to them. Perhaps where I went wrong was not attaching the short paraphrase to the paragraph rather than forcing it to be a conclusion. I can see where you might mistake it for a “therefore” rather than a conclusion of my point on feminist attacks on the church.

Let’s settle this first point between us before going on.

Before I sign off, I want to address another statement Jodie Howerton made;
“One male leader in particular frequently clarifies that the target of their ministries, the very reason they exist, is to reach lost men. He rails against a “chickified” church and insists Jesus would have spent his Saturdays watching football and drinking beer.” ( I am taking her word about these comments) Personally, I think this “leader” is out of line making statements like this. Not only that, he should be removed from his position until his attitude has changed. His remarks are not acceptable, in my opinion. Not all leaders are saved, and not all leaders further the cause of Christ. This leader falls into one of these two categories.
DLStokes

Don't worry, Bluediamond. I'm not offended in the least. I am secure in who Jesus is, in who he made me to be and in how he loves ALL of humanity equally and with divine perfection. Mr. Stokes' own arguments are enough to implicate him in issues of intolerance, hatred, and general ignorance of biblical scholarship. No real response or retort is needed from me....

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
I'm a Southern California native living in the Northwest with one husband, two kids, and a dog. I'm a runner, a reader, a writer, a pastor's wife, and lots of other things...


Media