I'm intrigued by the wondering out there this week as to whether it’s kosher for athletes to praise God when they’re interviewed after a victory. Kosher may not be the right word, for literally that would mean it is acceptable to religious people—or at least a specific portion of them. And the question at hand seems to be whether it is acceptable to the non-religious people who have to hear all this “glory-to-Godding.” So let’s think about this for a few minutes. One of the key criticisms of athletes who thank or praise God for a victory goes like this: “Well, of course they’re praising God. They won.” It’s not a criticism that’s too verifiable because, well, normally postgame reporters only interview the winners. Except there was one very interesting moment during the Super Bowl that might actually have revealed a look at the other side. In the fourth quarter, Matt Stover of the Indianapolis Colts missed a 51-yard field goal attempt. It was outside his range, really, so an unlikely effort. But when it fell short and left, Stover raised two fingers to the sky as though he had made it. CBS’ all-world sports anchor Jim Nantz didn’t miss the moment. He noted that this was something Stover does whether he makes or misses a field goal, because he is “a spiritual man.” In case you don’t know, Stover’s spirituality is most definitely of the Christ-focused sort—and, if his response to his missed field goal is any indication, perhaps a Calvinist as well. More than all that, what Stover may represent is the one thing the critics have counted on not existing: an athlete who praises God even when things aren’t going well. But let’s think further. What of the athlete who is purportedly a believer of the evangelical persuasion who doesn’t, you know, evangelize when the mic is thrust his way after a win? Would you ever imagine his silence to be a key component of his evangelism? Several years ago, I spent a good many minutes during an interview with a PGA Tour player talking about just this thing. With a couple of recent wins under his belt, I had been asked why he hadn’t said anything in his post-victory interviews—no strong it’s-all-about-Jesus words. So I put the question to him. His explanation was outstanding, and one we might do well to hear more often. You see, while PGA Tour players (and a lot of athletes in a lot of other sports) have regular interaction with fans, their closest day-to-day engagement is with their colleagues in the game. This particular player had been building at least one good friendship with a non-believing player, someone whose life he was having increasing opportunity to speak into. And this player to whom I was speaking suggested that should he come out with widely reported “Yea for Jesus!” words, his growing friendship with this other player might have been jeopardized. I know, there is much good reason to run with Paul’s words, “I’m not ashamed of the gospel” (Romans 1:16). There is reason as well to speculate that in God’s sovereignty had this player gone ahead with some Thank you, Jesuses, his friend might not have thought him to be a freak but authentic. Who knows? I would leave it to the Christ-centered athlete to judge in his or her own heart just where to go with words of testimony and praise when the lights are on and the cameras rolling. So here’s one thing we could conclude: an athlete who gives verbal praise is not doing as big a thing as we might suggest, be we in favor of those kinds of words or against them. Then again, I may be wrong. After all, I hear no battles raging over Olympic figure skater Johnny Weir’s announcement that he is adorning his room in the Olympic Village with a photo of Lady Gaga, saying, “She needs to be there watching over us, protecting us.” Maybe people only get opinionated when the words are about God, and especially when Jesus is named. |

EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS







Comments
Jeff,
Since I'm sure you've pondered this, I'd like to hear your thoughts on what motivates an Evangelical athlete to overtly display religion at an athletic event. These days it seems to have become fashionable, and I suppose there may even be a subculture in which such displays are viewed, for whatever reason, as really cool or righteous, perhaps even as the ultimate goal, or as the Christian justification, for being an athlete in the first place. Anyhow, I find it difficult not to suspect that in such subcultures these sorts of displays have simply acquired the status of a norm, and that to fail to perform them is like the failure of a Presidential candidate to wear a flag pin. Since I suppose that my attitude here is rather condescending, I'd like to give you the opportunity to correct it, and to suggest the real reasons why athletes praise Jesus for kicking field goals, or paint Bible verses on their cheeks. Any thoughts are appreciated.
I can actually reduce the most common motivation to a word, because it is the word I have often heard from athletes and those who disciples them: platform. Many Christian athletes believe that their place as athletes in a sports-crazed society gives them a place of influence that others may not commonly have. This is heightened in the wake of a victory, and even more so as those victories mount in one's career.
I wouldn't call this a wild perspective, but not especially spiritual either. Winning athletes with winning personalities receive much bigger endorsement deals than athletes with non-All Star, non-Hall of Fame careers or winning athletes with lousy personas. The difference, of course, is that Christian athletes often figure their wins are meant by God to give them an extra opportunity, so to speak, to say something positive for Jesus. Just like those athletes doing ad spots, some pull this off better than others (i.e., more naturally, less glibly, etc.).
I would certainly think this a more noble motivation than praising God because it is cool or righteous.
The other point you make--that some would view victory as a justification for pursuing sports in the first place--is a tough question, because now we're questioning one's heart (though I think rightly). But here's an oft-forgotten piece of Scripture that might help us review our own skeptical perception of these sometimes awkward "rah rah God" moments: "It is true that some preach Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill. The latter do so in love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel. The former preach Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely, supposing that they can stir up trouble for me while I am in chains. But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice" (Philippians 1:15-18, NIV, my emphasis added).
That passage can lead us down some disturbing hypothetical paths, but it is there to be reckoned with all the same. I may not preach Jesus as others would, but I do need to ask myself whether they're preaching Jesus as he is. And perhaps what Paul was really saying is what I might say myself--that I am not sure I trust myself to make that call.
(BTW, I for one sensed no condescension in your attitude.)
It strikes me as entirely commendable for athlete to maintain a larger perspective in a sports-crazed society. I suppose it's also noteworthy that Christianity offers a perspective in which athletic fame, however prized, is of merely instrumental value. Finally, I appreciate your sensitivities to the better or worse ways in which this "advertizing" for Jesus is done.
Given how reasonable all this seems to me, you've got me to wondering why anyone would shy away from characterizing these activities as attempts to proselytize. Somehow that word ("proselytize") seems worrisome. I think might respect the athlete (and I'm sure there are such athletes) who straightforwardly explain his/her actions as attempts to simply advertize for the faith, just as you've described.
Or is there still something disconcerting about using such platforms to proselytize? Even if one agrees with his cause, Bono can be annoying. Perhaps it has more to do with the ideology/faith for which one is proselytizing. Maybe even fool-for-Christ Evangelicals cringe when they see a celebrity advertizing for Scientology.
Anyhow, thank you for your thoughtful and illuminating response.
prom dresses 2012 light blue sundresses
prom dress shops flow and a pair of shiny sandals, or choose a very tailored to the light blue dress in a elegant materials.Choose a good
blue dresses
little black dress
short black dress start to the pack if it's cold or choose mid-length sleeve.In Italy the noodles take light blue dress
black dress
black dresses silk material will look great. for recreational occasions, try a lovely light blue summer dress or a simple the custom or straight blue arrangement;Dress baby;In a mediocre material.According to the situation, you can also choose to light blue dress.Short sleeve, cap sleeve, sleeve length mid-length steps sleeve, long sleeves is appropriate.To your favorite comfortable and pump or silver shoes for
celebrity dress silk material will look great. for recreational occasions, try a lovely light blue summer dress or a simple the custom or straight blue arrangement;Dress baby;In a mediocre material.According to the situation, you can also choose to light blue dress.Short sleeve, cap sleeve, sleeve length mid-length steps sleeve, long sleeves is appropriate.To your favorite comfortable and pump or silver shoes for
red dress
red dresses