It is suddenly serious season at the movies. The powerful, Oscar worthy film, THE BOY IN THE STRIPED PAJAMAS, arrives in theaters at an opportune time. Based upon an acclaimed novel by Irishman John Boyne, The Boy in the Striped Pajamas explores the horrors of Auschwitz with childlike wonder. It is driven by remarkable performances from two young actors, Asa Butterfield as Bruno and Jack Scanlon as Shmuel. As the son of a Nazi commandant, Bruno literally crosses the barbed wire that separates him from the imprisoned Shmuel. As Jesus crossed borders, so Bruno discovers that while barriers may divide us, bold sacrifices will unite us. As we conclude a divisive American presidential election, the question remains, “How do we work together?” Can we embrace those we disagree with, “the Other,” as more than an enemy? French philosopher and Talmud scholar Emmanuel Levinas suggested: I am responsible for the Other without waiting for reciprocity, were I to die for it. Reciprocity is their affair. It is precisely insofar as the relation between the Other and me is not reciprocal that I am in subjection to the Other; and I am “subject” essentially in this sense. It is I who support all…The I always has one responsibility more than all the others.
As co-director of Fuller Seminary’s Reel Spirituality Institute, I’ve written a study guide for The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. This free, downloadable resource gives filmgoers helpful ways to integrate this bridge-building film into their ministry. The study guide connects to clips from key scenes in this haunting film. You can preview the film and download the study guide here. |


EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS








Comments
Thank you for this Craig. My husband and I were just watching the trailer and discussing this movie. I'd love to take a look at the materials you referenced but the link appears to be dead.
Sorry about that Joan. Not sure what is happening there...you can cut and past the link into your browser--here it is: http://www.ccli.com/TheBoyInTheStripedPajamas/
Hi Craig-
Thanks for the notes on this film. I saw it last night and it's full of learnings. One of the many thoughts I had as I left the theater was this: Why does it seem that we are hesitant to move, act, or respond to a situation until we are personally affected by it? I have recently been struggling with this question and idea over the Eastern Congo Conflict. I'm passionate about making people aware of the crisis happening there because I have good friends there. I have also been to Congo DRC myself. I wonder however, if I would care as much for the horrible injustices taking place there right now if I didn't have a personal connection with it. And if that is the case, am I unintentionally ignoring the injustices happening else where in the world, by not paying as much attention to them out of lack of understanding or witnessing them first hand?
Just some thoughts...