EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

The Blind Side DVD Review

By now everyone knows the story behind the Michael Lewis book and the John Lee Hancock directed movie, "The Blind Side." This review coincides with the release of the DVD.

“The Blind Side” is the mostly true story of football star Michael Oher and Leigh Anne Tuohy, played in an Oscar-winning performance by Sandra Bullock. In the film, Tuohy begins to notice Oher and finds something of a connection to him. With a combination of her faith and intuition, she pursues Oher to afford him a better life. This involves bringing Oher – a poor and underachieving black man from the other side of the railroad tracks – into her white, upper class world. As Oher lives with the family, Tuohy recognizes a gift in Oher that she directly correlates to football, and the mentoring begins.

“The Blind Side” is not the type of movie I’d normally go out to see in the theaters. The story does not initially appeal to me due to what appears to be a largely routine, predictable affair. I know that there will be a standard set-up, momentum, conflict, and finally “inspiring” resolution to the story. It looks like an updated version of “Remember the Titans,” a film I passively enjoyed but only mildly cared about.

However, I saw “The Blind Side” with my family in the theater and found myself really getting into the film. It took me by surprise for several reasons: The cross-cultural aspect of the film may be simplified, but I like how it asks “what if?” regarding the cultural divide. People make assumptions about one another due to race and status on both sides of the coin in the film, but the centerpiece characters are obviously enriched because of their experience.

The film also fairly challenges the motives of Bullock’s character. Was she hand picking football players? What if Oher was a short, scrawny black kid? Would the results have been the same? Last, I enjoyed the country club restaurant sequences where the film nicely pokes fun at the socio-economic divides where the rich, detached wives talk about their charities while munching down overpriced appetizers and salads.

Perhaps most enjoyable was the way in which the film reminds us to see the gifts in others and pursue those gifts. Thanks to Tuohy’s ability to see a gift in Oher, she enabled him to bring his talents out. This type of mentorship is one in which we see the strengths in others and focus on those strengths to help them overcome the challenges they face. Just as importantly, Tuohy was changed by Oher.  

I find that many assume that in these types of relationships – rich/poor, missionary/non-converted, etc – that we assume it is only one side of the relationship who will be making the change in the other's life. Oher reached out to Tuohy, as evidenced by the fact that the film shows Oher being adopted into the family. It is inspiring to see film’s like this that are unabashedly in love with their subjects and how the power of team athletics create a community in which others push one another to greatness. My movie snobbery was once again humbled. I liked “The Blind Side.”

In honor of the film's recent DVD release, we are going to give away 3 copies of the film on DVD. Here is what you need to do: In the comments section below, tell me about one or two films you have seen that caught you by surprise. Either you were expecting to love them but didn’t, or you weren’t expecting anything and ended up being pleasantly surprised. Or, if you have adopted someone to live in your home that you met on the street, that will qualify too. Or just the film’s is fine. Take your pick. I’ll choose the answers I like best. Good luck!

Comments

This is an easy one for me: High Fidelity.

I remember watching High Fidelity in college for the first time, going in with little to no expectations about it. And yet, it is one of the few movies I own (next to Ghostbusters) that I re-watch at least several times a year. I've told my wife that more than any other movie, High Fidelity has shaped the way I view my relationships with women (including her!). It was the movie that first challenged me to differentiate between the "fantasies" about women I had in my head and the "realities"of real relationships and love, warts and all, that I had in front of me. This movie also introduced the world to the greatness that is Jack Black being "Jack Black." For that, I will be forever in its debt...

Glad to hear The Blind Side was a positive surprise. I find that high expectations are often disappointed but it is such a great feeling to have my negative expectations of a film contradicted.

Two such experiences jump quickly to mind: I went into Joe Wright's Pride & Prejudice fully intending to be able to tell everyone afterwards how bad it was, but instead I found a genuinely romantic film (thanks largely to the categorical absence of kissing in the British cut) with an extraordinary performance by Keira Knightley. The revelation for me that distinguished her so much from her predecessor (Jennifer Ehle) was Knightley's ability to make Austen's memorable one-liners sound like she was saying them for the first time, rather than like the over-rehearsed sententiae they have since become. The double-triumph was the director's ability to make a film that was worthy of its own artform rather than another documentary recording of a glorified stage adaptation like the BBC/A&E version.

I have never been so pleased to have my expectations proven wrong... until last year when Tarantino's new film totally confounded my anti-Tarantino prejudices. Its chilling commentary on patriotic war films in the first two "chapters" would have been provocative enough, but the climax's direct indictment of vicarious audience participation in on-screen violence completely short-circuited everything I thought I knew about "Tarantino films." Not only has it forced me to re-evaluate Tarantino's own movies, but it has made me reconsider my own attitude to classic American cinema in general and war films in particular.

I recently rented "17 Again" from the public library and convinced (a.k.a. forced) my husband to watch it with me. We both expected it to be cheesy, shallow, teeny-bopper-fluff drivel. My husband groaned as the perfectly coiffed Mike (played by Zac Efron, who neither of us had never seen in any other television/movie performance) danced with cheerleaders and recited forced lines during the first 30 minutes of the movie. I'm glad that we gritted our way through it because we ended up laughing and tearing up (okay, I was the only one who cried) as Mike explored his relationships with his family and friends from the fresh perspective of a 17-year-old boy. We were both pleasantly surprised by the film's humor (several legitimately laugh-out-loud lines) and touching moments (ultimately accepting responsiblity for your decisions and being happy with what you have instead of living in a constant state of "what if"/"if only"). Ultimately the movie is still pretty fluffy but we genuinely enjoyed it and would watch it again (although I'm not sure my husband would openly admit that).

I can't say that I've ever adopted anyone off the street but when I first moved to LA I was adopted off the street... I'm still very grateful for that, the kindness of strangers can be incredible.

Thanks for the opportunity and keep up the awesome review-writing!

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
Christopher is a Marriage and Family Therapist completing his license in Southern California.  He loves to write about films, make music, and spend time with his lovely wife.


Media