EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

November Reviews

My latest batch of movie annotations, humbly submitted, and on time, too!

Ballast, a homegrown indie, observes the tentative attempts at human connection between three emotionally wounded working-class individuals in rural Mississippi. Almost defiantly (and certainly unfashionably) subdued, it draws its strength from the bleak expressiveness of the locale—overcast skies, muddy fields, rows of depressing trailer homes, and other such mundanities. Lance Hammer, the debuting writer-director, shows promise as an image-maker, taking some of the more annoying trends in low budget filmmaking (an unsteady camera, wobbly focus) and using them to his advantage. As a storyteller he is on less sure footing (a subplot involving a gang of drug dealers is awkwardly ditched), and the film turns out to be something of a mixed blessing. Better than no blessing at all.

Slumdog Millionaire is a rags-to-riches drama, very much in the style of a Bollywood crowd-pleaser, about a teenaged street urchin’s unlikely surmounting of the Indian Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? game show, in order to reunite with the love of his life. Part treatise on the horrors of Indian slum life, part pie-eyed love story, the film is flashily directed by the always-energetic Danny Boyle, who struggles to find an appropriate style to match his subject. A little more sobriety would have been appreciated, but a formula this surefire rarely goes awry, and it doesn’t.

Quantum of Solace is a watchable if uninspired addition to the undying Bond canon, which lately has insisted on an illusion of realism while serving up scene after scene of death-defying action. A little too edgily edited and mechanically plotted to be truly exciting, it nevertheless preserves the attractive image of 007 as a wounded knight, and Daniel Craig has the screen presence to back up such a conceit. Mathieu Almaric, too, has a moment or two of inspired treachery as the rodenty villain. Directed by Marc Forster.

Australia is a grand swing-and-a-miss for Baz Luhrmann, a two-and-three-quarters-hour epic covering a cross-country cattle drive, the plight of the “stolen generation” of aboriginal half-castes, and the bombing of Darwin, Australia by Japanese forces. Luhrmann’s unwillingness to work with the natural beauty of the landscape (a normal sunset won’t do; everything has to be enhanced with CGI) is the least of his troubles—he struggles with basic storytelling. (How do Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman ever get out of Never Never desert?) Through all the artifice, David Wenham makes a strong impression as a greedy rancher with a sadistic streak. 

Comments

Yeah, I don't get this "realism" that has been introduced to the Bond franchise, either. I've heard critics say that it brings a new edge--even a moral awareness--to the Bond films that wasn't present before, but what's being forgotten here is that Bond, at the core, is an American myth, an integral part of our pop culture. Dressing him down is akin to revealing the "darker" side of Santa Claus, or remaking something like "A Charlie Brown Christmas" as a neorealist film (although that might work, come to think of it). Regardless, the myth is always going to remain, no matter how much of the surface you chip away.

And as for Australia, were you really expecting anything more from Luhrmann? Is there a particular "natural beauty" you saw in Moulin Rouge or Strictly Ballroom that led you to hope for the same in Australia? I've found that part of appreciating Luhrmann is simply accepting his superficiality at the outset and moving from there; all intentional fallacy aside, from this point-of-view he suddenly becomes this magnificent (if sometimes downright scary) representation of everything the MTV movement of the mid 80s-early 90s was desiring to achieve. Then again, I haven't actually seen Australia yet, so I'm mostly just riffing off Rouge here.

I don't want to take anything away from Luhrmann's achievement here. It's very difficult to shoot in one of the most spectacular locations in the world and still come up with something this garish. The MTV link is an accurate one, I think, and probably explains my allergic reaction to his work. Simply put, I think he's tacky. His enthusiasm can sometimes counter the tackiness, but it usually only exacerbates it.

My feeling is that he's got enough headstrong ambition to make me believe there's a great film in him, but brother, Australia ain't it.

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
''Not everything has a name. Some things lead us into a realm beyond words… By means of art we are sometimes sent—dimly, briefly—revelations unattainable by reason.'' Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize-Winning Author


Media