More quickie reviews, cooled from weeks of neglect: The simple appeal of the first Hellboy can be found in its paradoxical protagonist: a demon with a gentle spirit who fights on behalf of the good guys. In Hellboy II: The Golden Army, director Guillermo del Toro does almost nothing with this conceit, showing little interest in the interiority of its characters while fanning his obsession with elaborately designed monsters. Like his overrated Pan’s Labyrinth (whose fairy tale atmosphere was patronizing), there is a lot to distract the eye, but little to engage the head or heart. Briefly, fleetingly, the film will seduce you with its majestically dark vision of a supernatural underworld, but this vision is undermined by the silly comic book plotting, which basically comes down to a lot of martial arts-style skirmishing. Still recommended for the memorable appearance of a legless Irish troll, a butt-ugly creation that finds the right balance between humor and terror. Tell No One is a tricky thriller from France, drawing its scenario from an American suspense novel, about a doctor who learns, eight years after losing his wife to a serial killer, that his wife may in fact be alive and well and nearer than he thinks. Under the patient hand of director Guillaume Canet, the film is evenly paced, meticulous, engrossing, and maintains a mood both suspenseful and sensual (or “suspensual,” as a friend of mine might say). As the doctor and husband, Francois Cluzet gives an intensely focused performance—his muted anguish and steely determination is so deeply felt that it nearly atones for the incredible convolutions that come to light during the final scenes. Still and all, the last few shots are genuinely moving—the benefit of all the patient craftsmanship. I’m a bit relieved to report that The Dark Knight no longer occupies the #1 spot on IMDb’s chart of the greatest films ever made (it currently rests at #3, between The Godfather and The Godfather Part II). While Batman Begins marked vigorous steps toward realism and dramatic heft within the superhero genre, The Dark Knight overdoses on terrorist spectacle and moral ambiguity. This makes it great for post-movie discussion but agony to sit through (can a film suffer from too much gravitas?). A gripping opening scene depicts a bank robbery in which the participants are whittled down like the Ten Little Indians from the famous nursery rhyme, but the remainder of the film is surprisingly talky (although perhaps not “surprisingly,” considering Nolan’s penchant for verbiage). The scenes with the Joker are good for a disgusting, creepy thrill (Ledger’s whole hog performance is galvanizing), and there’s at least one altercation between him and the caped crusader, photographed from low angles for maximum impact, in an emptied city street that gets the adrenaline pumping. On the whole, though, a step backward for the Batman franchise. Its orgiastic reception by the culture at large speaks less of the film’s quality than of the impressionability of the moviegoing public. |


EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS







Comments
Some really fine writing here, Mr. Bell.
I had a very similar reaction to Dark Knight, which I've documented in my archives and hope to get published on my blog soon. For all its ambiguous moral "complexities," it's just not very good cinema; the best Nolan seems to muster in all those talky scenes you mentioned is to surround the actors with some fancy 360-degree camera pans and not much else. I would have loved to see what Cronenberg would have done with this material.
By the way, any words on Farber's recent passing? I was somewhat shocked, given I had coincidentally purchased a copy of his Negative Space at Half-Price Books the very day before he died. I've been rereading it the past few days in light of all the wonderful eulogies going around, and I hope many others will discover his prose as a result of the recent acknowledgments (even Ebert has a nice write-up).
Glad I'm not alone in finding The Dark Knight overrated. Even if I were alone, there's still no getting around the fact that I just didn't enjoy it very much. I watched Nolan's Memento again recently and I still think it's a clever sleight of hand, and proficiently directed, too. I've even come to appreciate the intricate structure of The Prestige. So I'm not a Nolan naysayer by any means. I look forward to reading your blog entry when and if you get around to it, Jeremy.
I was tempted to say something about Farber's passing, but I thought I'd leave that task to the people who knew him best. I found Rosenbaum's article particularly rewarding. Farber was a critic's critic, and sometimes he'd be so far ahead of everybody else that reading him could be confounding. But he opened my mind to all kinds of concepts, both cinematic and philosophical. His approach was unique, his writing style exhilarating. I have a dog-eared copy of Negative Space at home, the same one my dad bought when he was studying film at UCSB. It's a must-own.
I'd like to explore his artwork a little more, since he considered himself a painter first and foremost. I like the one you put up on your site, Jeremy. What a termite artist!
I liked The Dark Knight a bit more than you did, but agree that it's overrated. It's biggest offense is its unnecessary long ending. It just becomes silly and progressively unbelievable.
Thanks for your two cents, Ray. Now, I've come to expect inflated running times from big summer movies, but you're right, Dark Knight grinded on a bit. Just when things start to wind down around the 1:45 mark, it picks up again for another 45 minutes! I guess we can't say we didn't get our money's worth.