EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

January Reviews

Cassandra’s Dream, Woody Allen’s third film shot during his extended stay in England, is a noose-tightening thriller of concentrated power. One of the few directors in Hollywood still making overtly moral tales, Allen seems obsessively fixated on the workings of chance, fate, and destiny in a world he perceives to be cruel and chaotic. The film feels swift, almost rushed, as though the workaholic Allen were trying to speed through the proceedings so he could move on to the next project. (He averages about one movie per year.) Less of a downer than Match Point, whose fatalistic storyline felt like posturing, the film proves that Allen has the courage to follow his frightened worldview to its logical conclusion. The weight of sin hangs heavily in the air, but this time, he doesn’t let the characters off the hook.

Cloverfield is that happy accident—a witty monster movie. Thetropes are stale (skyscraper-sized amphibious creature runs amok inNYC), but the presentation is fresh (story told through the lens of asingle video camera). The credited director, Matt Reeves, displays acruel showmanship, destroying members of his tiny cast just as soon aswe get to know them. Social commentary is wisely kept to a minimum(nothing spoils a Saturday matinee like a Sunday sermon), although thesight of buildings crumbling to dust will seem horribly familiar to anyinhabitant of the 21st century. In this respect, the movie resembles anightmare with an unshakable context.

Mad Money, a comic caper about three disparate, desperate womenwho plot to pocket cruddy currency scheduled for destruction, is like afemale Ocean's Eleven,without the Soderbergh glitz. Surprisingly watchable, it draws itscharm from the chemistry between its three larcenous ladies (DianeKeaton the spoiled rich gal, now facing bankruptcy; Queen Latifah thestruggling single mom; and Katie Holmes, the bubble-headedtrailer-dweller). Fluffy, but forgettable.

Tags | Film

Comments

jeremycaution - Comment below viewing threshold: -4
-4

See, what I found most frightening and provocative about Match Point was the way Allen allowed his protagonist to escape judgment. It was like a splash of cold water in the face, drawing awareness to the way audiences readily accept moral pay-offs in films of its nature.

Interesting that you enjoyed Cassandra's Dream, though. From what I've read, you seem to be in a distinct minority, although I haven't browsed MetaCritic yet. I never would have counted you as a big Woody admirer.

natebell - Comment below viewing threshold: -2
-2

My friend Clint is a much stronger advocate of Woody. I tend to flip flop. But I do find this late career turn very interesting, and I'd like to delay making a final opinion until his filmography has played itself out. Maybe there's less here than meets the eye, I don't know.

Good comment about Match Point. I, too, was disturbed by the evasive ending, but I reacted negatively to it. Now I wonder if I judged it too rashly.

A. Walter - Comment below viewing threshold: -1
-1

You're tempting me with this one, Nate. Still, I've got 2 (not-entirely-rational) reasons to stay away from this film. First, I have the memory of watching previews before No Country for Old Men and, absurdly, finding Colin Farrell in every single one. I feel like he's a new kind of toothpaste that someone's trying to make me buy.

Second, I haven't seen a new Allen film since The Curse of the Jade Scorpion, and I'm loath waver from my abstinence. I'd rather catch up with his older stuff. Someday, though, I'm sure I'll eventually watch some of the better "final films" of Woody Allen.

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
''Not everything has a name. Some things lead us into a realm beyond words… By means of art we are sometimes sent—dimly, briefly—revelations unattainable by reason.'' Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize-Winning Author


Media