I’m glued to the TV, but I’m not watching a televangelist. I’m watching the news stories about Spitzer’s prostitute fiasco. My mind flashes back to what my mom always told me as a little kid: “Be sure your sins will find you out.” Political commentators and the friends and enemies of Spitzer are saying similar things. “He should have known that he would get caught, so he shouldn’t have done it.” But it seems to me that “Be sure your sins will find you out” is a lousy motivation for good behavior. As Mike Erre, my virtual pastor (the guy whose sermons I listen to while on the treadmill), says: We make a mistake in our Christianity when we make it transactional. Transactional faith is premised on the theory that if I do something, then God will react – as in “if I’m good, He’ll bless me” and “if I’m bad, He’ll punish me.” Transactional faith says that we avoid sinning because of the consequences that will eventually follow. There are two flaws with refraining from sin for fear of discovery. First of all, God knows about it before our sin is committed. So it is already discovered by the One who is most important. Secondly, and most importantly, public knowledge of our sin is the wrong motivation for avoiding it. Instead of a transactional faith that fears the reaction to our sin, I want to be motivated by a relational faith – a faith refrains from sin because I love God so much. I’m a good enough lawyer and schemer that I, probably like Clinton and Spitzer, could delude myself into thinking that I could pull off adultery without discovery. So, I believe it is my love for my wife (not fear of discovery) that keeps me from cheating on her. And that is how it should be with our attitude toward our sins: Is our love for God our primary motivation for our conduct? Do we refrain from sin because we want to obey God and honor Him? Conversely, when our sin is uncovered and made public, is our confession motivated by true repentance and sorrow, or are we simply sorry we got caught? But this is a discussion for another day. Right now I have to rush back to the convention floor where some televangelist is shouting, "Jesus wants to save you, but he won't do it for free." |


EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS








Comments
Very well said. I like your virtual pastor's way of thinking.
Thanks for sharing. I just know you are having a blast at conference!
God Bless!
Teresa
Teresa --
Thanks for your comment. Having a virtual pastor is the way to go. (They never take an offering.) The conference was a blast -- kind of like visiting another world.
Bruce
I bet, I was kinda jealous when you mentioned big hair....
Yes, Bruce, you've hit on a key distinction between those who obey out of fear and those who obey out of love (wasn't Machiavelli in on that discussion, too). Your marriage analogy is perfect.
Thanks for skipping out on one of those seminars/pep rallies/keynotes to write this.
Caroline -- See, that's the difference between you and me. You spend your time reading things like Machiavelli, and I spend my time surfing the cable news channels.
Bruce
It's interesting that a similar point of view can be arrived at through a secular mindset. I recently attended a medical ethics seminar in which one of the speakers' thesis was that we should behave ethically not because we might get caught if we don't or even because it is the best thing for the patient, but because we are ethical people.
I would go further and say that we strive to be ethical people because of our born again relationship with Jesus Christ.
(Several people in the seminar tried to point out that the values we want to embody come from the Judeo-Christian tradition, but the speaker danced around that)