EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

Capitalism and his Girlfriend Original Sin: Let’s Just Say It’s Complicated

This is a re-post of a former essay. Let's just say I liked it when I wrote it the first time, and I still do. It forced me to articulate new thoughts, which is exactly why I love to write.  So, here it goes to the top of the rotation. 

If you follow ConversantLife somewhat regularly, you’ll notice a trend lately toward anti-consumerism (including some of my own posts). It seems the right thing to be—a lover of God and humanity more than a lover of things, a Christ follower who chooses abstracts like love and peace over crass commercial objects. I’ve been feeling the vibe myself. Christians, you know, can be very anti-establishment when it suits us.

All the talk of philanthropy and anti-consumerism has gotten me thinking. I’m sure lots of other people have thought about these things longer than I have. I’ll bet I could find a hundred books debating the virtues and vices of capitalism. I am not a student of economics, so pardon any embarrassing gaps in my understanding, but here’s a simple layman’s exploration.

I am struggling with the link between greed and capitalism. What would happen if all the corporate moneygrubbers converted this year and everyone became a philanthropist? Truth is, most of the things that I enjoy in my home were made by companies whose founders, at some point, were hungry for a profit. What man finds meaning and pleasure in manufacturing toilet paper or aluminum siding, for example, just for the joy of it? So, if God wants all of us to share, conserve, reduce, and give away, what would become of America? Someone else’s greed has enabled me the freedom to live humbly or to live extravagantly. Thus is the thorny way of capitalism.

Now this leads me other things that give me a headache. What if every family in America was sincerely convicted to withhold its money from the Big Box retail conglomerates and give it away to noble foreign causes? No doubt, the Targets and Best Buys and Wal-Marts would collapse, leaving many manufacturers to fire their employees. Ah, but there’s the catch, for if man’s heart were pure around the world, then noble capitalists wouldn’t need to pay out to war torn countries in the first place. Nor would I give away my old clothes to the homeless, for under God’s principles, the complex conditions leading to homelessness wouldn’t exist.

And what if all the abortion clinics suddenly adopted God’s view of the sanctity of life? If we would reverse every abortion in American this year, imagine the economic impact all those children (many of them in situations of poverty and dysfunction) would have on our culture? But there we go again, for if we were really doing things God’s way, then many of those desperate children wouldn’t have been desperate in the first place (nor even conceived in an unhallowed place, for that matter) . . . and so goes our endless rewind. Every charitable act is predicated on the sin that required it. If that doesn’t blow your mind, read that sentence again.

And now, my head throbbing tonight, I realize that sin seems to be part of the American Dream, and I’m having trouble with that. I’m a product of this centuries-old year national experiment, finding value and comfort in a world with good roads and clean water and entertainment and a sturdy paycheck and light bulbs that go on and off on command. Profit and innovation and greed and curiosity and convenience and narcissism and sin get so mixed up together that I can’t figure out how to get to the beginning of the string. So when I say a sweet prayer with my kids at night that goes something like “Thank you, God, for blessing us with a warm house and food to eat,” it’s starting to feel positively weird. Should I not pray instead, “Thank you, God, that American self-absorption and corporate greed paved the way to our comfort”?

The more I unravel this ball of yarn, the more confused I become. The what-ifs are keeping me awake, and I keep going back and back and back to the beginning of the problem, trying to figure out God’s purposes. And you know where I end up?

The Garden of Eden.

That’s the only place where all the bohemian dreams and political hopes can hope to thrive, and I’m afraid we already missed that train. I understand a little better why hippies wanted to shut out all the capitalist noise, and why human beings dream up utopian societies. We’re all trying to get back to the Garden of Eden, if you ask me.

Perhaps capitalism is the best we’ve got in a fallen world. You may complain that nothing on the ideological menu looks very good to you, including democracy and its free enterprise system, but the alternatives--such as dictatatorship, poverty, injustice, and civil war--will give you food poisoning. The same system that allows us to squash the little guy and over-consume also allows us to love our fellow man. Sin might be part of the human equation, but with Jesus’ help, I’m doing my darndest to make it not so.

It’s complicated and I’m sure somebody’s got a book title they can recommend. But I’m an essayist, and it’s my job to get in and get out for the sake of time and space. In a phrase, original sin always gets us into trouble and God’s grace always gets us out. Tonight, that’s good enough for me.

Comments

Thanks a lot, Caroline. Now you've got my own head spinning. And just as I was about to go out and do some Christmas shopping. Now all I can think of is your meddling essay and those closing lyrics from CS&N's "Woodstock"--

We are stardust, we are golden,
We are caught in the devil's bargain,
And we got to get ourselves back to the garden.

Wow--those lyrics connect so well . . . I'm going to check out that song (C for "Crosby," right?). Thanks for reading a thorny essay during the fluffy holidays.

Yes, Crosby, as in Crosby, Stills & Nash. Their song "Woodstock" is an iconic anthem of the 1960s. Of course, as the saying goes, if you can remember the sixties, you weren't really there.

The thing I find most disturbing in all the conversations about the economy right now is that our collective goal seems to be to recover our capacity to spend freely, allowing our use of money to be guided by our lusts and impulses. I'm convinced that Bill McKibben, in his easy to understand book, "Deep Economy" has accurately articulated that the problem is that the system of producing the most goods at the cheapest price is inherently flawed because the criteria to reach that goal always comes at the cost of human dignities and freedoms, and environmental degradation. If we could begin a conversation about moving towards more localized economies, we might come closer to a more sustainable model. Thanks for provoking the conversation.

You're absolutely right, Richard, about the flawed collective goal: to be free to be guided by our lusts and impulses. Localized economies are the right idea, I think, as you mentioned, but even those (under my "original sin" premise) are bound to exploit others without moral guidance. I'm trying not to get so frustrated with earthbound systems that I forget to improve the ones we've got!

"Every charitable act is predicated on the sin that required it."

Okay, seriously - you rock like a boulder. I'm so reading all your stuff from now on - that was incredible! And you're dead on. Read Luke 16:1-15. Jesus literally tells us to use our worldly wealth (which He qualifies as acquired through shrewd means) to do as much good as possible (to make friends for ourselves) so that we will be welcomed into eternal rewards. It is mind-boggling that my comfort comes at the expense of millions of people going into debt or remaining in poverty over materialistic wants... but then again, God enables me to turn around and pour back into them to meet their needs through the very thing that they wasted... the thing I would not have, had they not wasted it. It all ties back to the parable of the talents - he who has been faithful with little will be entrusted with much. He who has been unfaithful in little, even what he has will be taken from him and given to the one who is faithful.

You just brought those scriptures to screaming new life for me. Thanks.

I hadn't even thought about the parable of the talents--that's a fantastic insight on your part. (And anyone who uses the phrase "You rock like a boulder" is my new best friend.) That parable is problematic for a lot of readers, and I like the connection you made.

So much of the Christian faith is based on profound paradoxes, not the least of which is Christmas itself. I thank you for further illuminating another one for me.

I think the lack of a solution has more to do with a lack of imagination and desire than sin. I have always said that we could end global poverty in a year, we just don't have the imagination (the ability to create something tangible out of an idea) or desire to make it happen. What we must do, is flex our imagination and embrace a desire for change, something your blogs consistently challenge us to do!

Capitalism is a unique way to do business. There is a big difference from making a profit and greed. Sometimes, greed drives profit. Sometimes profit provides more workers productive jobs. But making losses is NEVER good. So what's the alternative? The idealism of capitalism or any other model hits the wall of sin the same way. Satan will do anything to pervert something sound, and corrupt it. Is it profitable to develop a cure for a disease that cost $5,000,000 and sell each dose for $1.00 (because the manufacturer wants to give the people a break)? Maybe...... But is it greedy to allow Wall Street to DEMAND a return on investment for a (1) year payback, thereby requiring each dose to cost $500? Should Wall Street have the power to destroy a company by simply demonizing it because it fails to meet Wall Streets' terms? The problem is there are SOME people out there that ARE greedy, there are SOME that are not. And there are so many who wash back and forth between the two in varying degrees all the time. Is philanthropy good only when you get a lot of other people's money? Or is TRUE philanthropy present when we give when we have little to give? The Bible tells of many more givers who gave out of their poverty than out of their wealth. When sinful man becomes sinless, capitalism will be perfect. But since mankind is sinful, no plan will be without flaws.

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
Why Cracks? Because in my suburban world, the collision of faith and modern life is sometimes messy. Can I find beauty, not only in Christianity’s smooth concrete, but also in the broken places?


Media
Resources