John Barry

Passion Week is a Calling and You're Called

John Barry — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:55:00 -0700

My friend walked up to me weeping. I asked him what was wrong. He responded, "I just read the Gospel of Luke. I think I need to sell everything and follow Jesus. ... But that's not what makes me sad; it's that I am so far from Christ. All these years I've been following Him and I'm just now realizing what it means to actually follow Him. He was willing to give everything for me, and I must give everything for Him."

I cried too. It changed my life. I wanted to respond with some scholastic copout about metaphors or hyperbole, but I knew that wasn’t the truth. Christ has called us to give everything for Him.

But I must tell you that God is still working this great work in me. And as for my friend, I recently brought this story up to him, and he said that God is still doing the great work in him as well. What we share in common is that Christ has seriously transformed both of us since that day.

As Easter has been marketed, sold, and bought, so we have done the same with our souls. To use a cliché from the epic '90s Christian rock era, we're not "sold out for Jesus"; we've sold out to the world. There is so much truth in the statement, "be in the world, but not of it." But the world sees a great lie when they look at the state of Christianity: statistically, we’re not living like Christ called us to, and that hinders the witness we’re meant to be. We have invested in expensive buildings and grounds, even doing so in the name of the "cornerstone." Meanwhile, the poor are dying. There are still unreached people all over the world. I could throw the facts at you about how bad the situation is, but you already know, and you also know that you should do something about it. It's the great enslavement of our generation. No one in this world should die from hunger or thirst; there is enough for everyone, but us with much to give aren’t giving.

If we're really honest with ourselves, we as Christians, as a whole, are as much of the world as we are in it. If you think me merely a cynic, and even if you don't, read the Gospel of Luke this week.

We as Christians have lost the passion of Passion Week. Yet, Christ's passion, instilled in us, is meant to be the primary factor that makes us Christian. Christ died for us, and we're called to be willing to do the same (Luke 9:23-25).

William Wilberforce, the great abolitionist put it this way:

"We turn from [Christ's work] coldly, or at best profess it negligently, as a thing of no account of estimation. But a due sense of its value would be assuredly impressed on by the diligent study of the Word of God, that blessed repository of divine truth and consolation. ... Reason dictates, Revelation commands; 'Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God' (Romans 10:17); 'Search the Scriptures' (John 5:39); 'Be ready to give to every one a reason of the hope that is in you' (1 Peter 3:15). ... Yet, it is not undeniable that with the Bible in our houses, we are ignorant of its contents; and that hence, in a great measure, it arises, that the bulk of the Christian world know so little, and mistake so greatly, in what regards the religion which they profess?" (Kevin Charles Belmonte (editor), A Practical View of Christianity; some punctuation changed).

5 Days in 4 Gospels Series (from the Archives)

P.S. I’ll be back to our spiritual gifts and offices series soon.

#Kony2012: Should You Donate? How NGOs Work

John Barry — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:12:23 -0800

When working on projects, we often say, “Chaos will ensue” and we’re happy when it does because it means we’re making progress. It’s also often said that “Inventions should cause disruption.” Sometimes that disruption is good and sometimes it’s bad. The kind of chaos and disruption Invisible Children’s #Kony2012 campaign has caused is good. No matter what side of the debate you’re on, you can’t argue against awareness about child soldiers and child sex slaves. If we don’t know, we can’t do anything. But there’s more to it than that, isn’t there? The concern is, “Should I donate?”

I serve as the treasurer for an NGO, as co-chair for a government set-up advisory board, and as the president of a church. (Yes, for incorporation purposes, churches have presidents.) So I have a bit of experience in the area of acceptable financial practices of donor or tax-payer funded entities. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I know enough to understand what I’m looking at when reading an organization's financials.

Now, I’m not going to go into the details about Invisible Children’s finances, because they’ve already adequately covered that in a recent response, but it should be noted that Invisible Children does several things they don’t have to do. For example, they post their financials on their website. So despite some recent claims that they’re required to do this; they aren’t. They do it because they want to be transparent.

In addition, Invisible Children’s financials have recently been approached from the stand-point of what they’re actually doing in Uganda. That approach misunderstands not only their stated goals—which involve awareness as a major component—but it also misunderstands how non-profits work. Although the majority of non-profits are doing physical work in some place, there is nothing to prevent a non-profit from being mainly about the goal of awareness. If that’s all Invisible Children did, and the government continued to be in approval of their 501(c)(3), it would be completely acceptable. But Invisible Children does more than raise awareness; they’re also doing incredible work on the ground. When approaching their financials, it’s inaccurate to suggest that money spent on travel or camera equipment is somehow not going towards their work. The travel expenses involve a massive part of their work since they travel around the nation campaigning and showing their films to raise awareness—not to mention all the trips they have to take to Africa to check on the progress of their projects, meet with partners, and get new footage.

One of the most startling things about joining a non-profit board is how much time and money is spent on insurance, building costs, computer costs, and other expenses that appear to be a distraction from your primary cause. But if these things don’t happen, the cause doesn’t happen. It’s a big misnomer that somehow non-profits are so different that people just bring their own computers, and pay for their own insurance, and that they’re all underpaid. People shouldn’t be paid top-notch salaries to work at a non-profit, but they should be paid well enough to make them feel appreciated. And a large staff to accomplish a big mission is expensive. (Note: I currently don’t get paid by a single non-profit.)

I’m also getting the feeling that people (especially the media?) are surprised by how fast the Kony 2012 campaign has gone viral and how many celebrities are for it. Now, I’m amazed like everyone else, but I’m even more shocked by how long it takes people to get impassioned about disheartening statistics elsewhere. I ran a campaign raising funds for Horn of Africa Famine Relief for my birthday, and I was amazed at how few people even wanted more information. We’re talking about 13 million people affected by this problem, and the famine didn’t even trend on Twitter (to my knowledge). So why aren’t we more shocked about the general apathy? Is compassion really that surprising? Shouldn’t that be the natural response?

So would I donate to Invisible Children? I haven’t yet, but that’s not because I’m somehow against what they’re doing financially or because I’m concerned that they support action by an army that has some corruption. (Reminder: Torture at Guantanamo Bay and American soldiers prosecuted for killing civilians. There is no excuse for brutality or war crimes, ever, but there is also no corruption free military. And sometimes military action is required, despite its flaws.) I haven’t donated to Invisible Children yet because I’m currently supporting aid relief with other organizations and because Invisible Children is doing pretty well financially.

But we should all be passionate about the cause of saving the lives of children (and Invisible Children may actually need the funding right now more than I realize, so I'm not suggeting my method). I have signed the petition, and recommend you do so as well; be listed among the names of citizens that demands that the US government bring Kony to justice. I also encourage you to watch the Kony 2012 film.

If you’re not sold on Invisible Children’s mission and methods, that’s one thing, but name a better way to end this problem and bring one of the leading war criminals of our time to justice. (Because the Rwanda Genocide is a testament to what happens when we do nothing.) If you’re more passionate about a different cause and want to donate to that, do so. But let’s not make excuses or accusations until we actually know the facts. And no matter what, donate to something that’s alleviating world poverty and bringing justice. It’s the least we can do.

The Delusionals Are Ruining the Fun

John Barry — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:54 -0800

We’ve all met the delusionals and the crazies in religion, or at least seen them on TV or YouTube. The way that they affect Christianity reminds me of what happens in work environments: One person does something stupid or abuses the system, and suddenly there is an additional code or protocol that everyone else has to follow. One person’s folly becomes everyone’s regret. Among Christians, it seems that our reaction to the loonies has made us all act a little crazy. Rather than seeking to distinguish between the spirits of good and evil, and sane and insane, we’ve generally abolished anything that seems a little odd or difficult to rationalize.

But there is comfort to be found in what Paul tells us about how spiritual gifts come into play, and how they should be used. He addresses the problems we’re dealing with head on.

We can’t “will” spiritual gifts into play on our own, like some Harry Potter spell; instead, only God can grant them, as He deems fit: “All these [spiritual gifts] are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills” (1 Cor 12:11 ESV). We cannot force spirituality; we can only invite it. And each person receives gifts as God wills.

All Christ followers were meant to be one with Christ; and as communities, we are meant to be unified together, as Christ as unified us to Himself, with the common purpose of God’s work among us (1 Cor 12:12–13). This does not downplay our diversity, and the unique ways in which God uses each of us, but instead emphasizes it. Paul uses the analogy of the human body to make this point. He suggests that as each member of the body is required for the overall body to function, holistically and healthily, so must each individual person play their part (1 Cor 12:14–21).

Each type of spiritual gift is needed for the church’s work. There is no part that is greater than the others.

When Paul made this point, he did so because the Corinthians had elevated particular spiritual gifts, specifically speaking in tongues, over others. Today, we have a similar problem: we often elevate people with speaking abilities (the pastor types), or those with lots of knowledge, over others. The other spiritual gifts are usually given the back seat.

It seems that we give certain spiritual gifts the back seat because we don’t understand our need for them, like how an unhealthy person doesn’t see the need for exercise. Or, because we’re simply uncomfortable with them, like how an unhealthy eater disliked vegetables at one point (because they were cooked wrongly), and now refuses to eat them. The fears aren’t rational, but we use them because they seem rational.

Since the loonies manifest similar attributes to some spiritual gifts, we’re worried about how out of control spirituality can become. And in return, we quietly banish it, like we do vegetables from our diet. Now, we rarely frame the issue this way—and thus I’m making it seem a little more cut and dry than it is for most people—but that’s the gist of what’s going on.

The only difference between the problems Paul was addressing and the problems we’re dealing with today is that the Corinthians were elevating the slightly more audacious gifts over the more modest ones. But it doesn’t take much to see how Paul’s words also apply to our situation:

“The parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, and on those parts of the body that we think less honorable we bestow the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty, which our more presentable parts do not require” (1 Corinthians 12:22–24 ESV).

After recognizing this point, Paul sticks it to the Corinthians. He won’t allow for this to go on.

“But God has so composed the body, giving greater honor to the part that lacked it, that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together” (1 Corinthians 12:23–26 ESV).

We rise together; we die together. Thus, we should suffer together. No fight is ever won by an army with merely one type of defense or attack. We need one another and the unique gifts God has granted each of us. Apart, we will fall. And if we continue to deny parts of God’s workings among us, we will certainly sacrifice God’s plans, and the amazing things He wants to do.

The honor in our communities doesn’t necessarily reside with the gifts that we regard highly; nor does it reside with the gifts we don’t regard at all. Instead, they’re all equal. The problem isn’t the gifts; it’s us.

What gifts are you honoring over others? How can you combat this in your community?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Spiritual gifts or curses?

We don’t compare ourselves to Elijah but should

Treating pastors like restaurant managers

Jesus in a cashmere sweater

Banishing Sunday school teachers

Spiritual gridlock: the end of miracles?

The myth of the apolitical church

Healing: it's what we all need

Help: a war cry, not a cry of desperation

Administrators: leaders, not paper pushers

Speaking in tongues: not crazy, just different

Interpreting, (well) everything

The higher gifts: an owner's manual

Why pastors never meet expectations

Looney tunes and the church

Purpose: it's confusing

"Be a man"

Growing pains: don't be like Mike

I don't want you to be uninformed

Spiritual gifts: a definition

Onward towards a better way

Where's God today?

Faith over intellect? Intellect over faith?

Faith as a gift

"Satan made me do it" and no one saw it

“Satan Made Me Do It” and No One Saw It

John Barry — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:30:01 -0800

“Satan made me do it,” and no one recognized it. Is it just me, or does this seem to be an accurate adage for how the Christian faith often functions today? As much as we may mention evil, and its ramifications upon our lives, how often are we really combatting it? Resisting temptations is one manifestation of opposing the dark powers that may be, but it is only one among many.

The evil things that creep into our lives and communities are often the kind that we don’t recognize—“a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” Most people can recognize a temptation when they see it, but there are also many subtle, evil things that slowly dwindle away at our dedication to following God’s will. These subtle, evil things manifest themselves in simple ways, like “reason” overpowering faith, and demonic possession being excused as merely mental illness.

There is a spiritual gift that those who know how to recognize evil have. Paul mentions it in one of his lists of spiritual gifts.

To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills (1 Corinthians 12:7–11 ESV).

More literally, this gift can be rendered as “distinguishing of spirits” or “distinction of spirits.” Paul regularly talks about good and evil—recognizing how these two opposing forces interact in our lives and in our communities.

The author of Hebrews makes nearly the same point as Paul: “But solid [spiritual] food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil” (Heb 5:14). Like faith, everyone who claims to believe in Jesus should have the ability to distinguish between good and evil things and spirits, but some are more gifted in this area than others. And note how the author of Hebrews prefaces this topic: using the word “constant.” The “practice” must be constant. It’s constant because evil is constant.

Although its not regularly discussed in most church communities—probably because its viewed as weird by those who don’t believe the same way—the warring powers of good and evil are a regular topic in the New Testament. Jesus, the apostles, and his disciples regularly cast out demons. Paul writes letters that have the fight against the powers of evil as a central topic, like his second letter to the Corinthians. And, Peter makes the fight against evil the crux of his second letter; ditto for Jude and John’s apocalypse that we call Revelation.

At the center of the Bible, thematically, is the idea of a war for souls, and the tragic love story of a God trying to prompt His beloved people away from these evil spirits and evil choices. These evil spirits are warring for our allegiance. They exist because, like us, they chose to follow their own wills over God’s perfect will.

Buy why would God let them exist at all? Everyday that God doesn’t vanquish the evil spirits from the earth is an opportunity for people to come to salvation. For the day that He vanquishes evil, He will destroy all of it, including evil people because they keep the evil spirits and other kinds of evil alive in them. But that day is not today. Instead, today Jesus offers grace in the hope that before the end we will choose Him back.

Between now and the last day, we as Christians must distinguish between good and evil spirits. We must know when it’s truly God performing miracles, offering a prophetic word, and speaking in tongues, and when its evil powers doing work that mimics God’s. This distinction comes through a knowledge base in the difference between good and evil, as articulated in the biblical text, and a dedication to prayer, so that we may receive wisdom and discernment. Furthermore, the distinction itself is simple in most cases: Is the [you name it] being used to free people and offer them the gracious way of Jesus, or is [you name it] being used for the power or gain of select individuals? (Who is it really about?) Now there are many situations that are too complicated for this question to answer—requiring those with the spiritual gift of discerning between spirits—but for most, this question can be used.

Those who are gifted in the area of discernment between the spirits must act. For if they don’t, we will all end up in a situation we don’t want to be in: a place where evil is guiding in our communities and hearts, not God. Christ has overcome evil; we must rely on Him to help us identify it and fight against it. For this reason, we must grant people with the gift of distinguishing between spirits the freedom to do so. We must embrace their gift, not be afraid of it.

How can you make people with the spiritual gift of discerning between spirits feel comfortable to speak up when the time comes?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Faith as a Gift

John Barry — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:47:31 -0800

I don’t know anyone that authentically follows Jesus that hasn’t struggled with faith at some point. Some people struggle intellectually: they learn something new and don’t know how to compute it with their faith. Others are troubled because of crisis: Something horrible happens and they don’t know if they believe anymore, because they can’t imagine God letting the pain or evil they’ve experienced go unchecked.

A little observed fact about Christianity is that struggle is a good thing. Few good things happen without scars. (And everyone needs to grow up, out of the ignorance of youth.) No one ever lived a great life without some sort of turmoil. The greatest leaders in Christianity have suffered for their beliefs, and nearly all of Jesus’ earliest followers died for their beliefs.

But it’s a major problem when we blame God for the physical, spiritual, and intellectual struggles we experience. This problem is rooted in a misunderstanding of how God operates in the world. The pain in our world is rooted in how people respond to God; not in God’s decisions. If we were all in perfect relationship with God, evil people wouldn’t exist. Likewise, if we were in perfect relationship with God, we wouldn’t have intellectual struggles. We would know Him and understand Him. And if we were in perfect relationship with God, the world wouldn’t be a chaotic mess full of physical pain.

In addition, intellectual struggles are usually rooted in ignorance, like the kind often manifested in fundamentalism. (“Just believe what we say,” is how I define fundamentalism.) In many sects of Christianity, faith is seen as something separated from intellect. Thus, when intellect is actually used to analyze faith, faith begins to crumble. I’m betting that if we taught the full truth in our churches, we wouldn’t see people lose faith in college. Instead, we would see them encounter things they already had an answer to. And when they didn’t have an answer, they would have a support system—in other people and in their own faith—to rely on. We would support them in the struggle. We need people to rely on, but who are they? How do we identify them?

Here’s where it gets really good: There is a spiritual gift to support people in faith struggles. Yes, faith itself can be a spiritual gift.

To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills (1 Corinthians 12:7–11 ESV).

Have you ever met someone with the gift of faith? They just seem to be faithful no matter what. They’re always loyal, always attached to Christ, and never cease to believe in the betterment of others. People with the gift of faith place everything in the hands of Jesus—claiming that He will redeem, no matter what the circumstances. These people are encouraging. They give us hope (which happens to be part of the definition of faith, in Hebrews 11:1).

Now, faith is required for all Christians, as is wisdom and knowledge. But the thing about spiritual gifts is that they are a way of labeling what comes easier for some people over others. (Spiritual offices are more unique in this regard.) Some are almost naturally wise—always observing. Others seem to just remember things—they know when others forget. And others just believe—no matter what, they have faith when others don’t.

The most faithful among us are rarely recognized. They’re uncompromising, but we don’t realize it because nothing ever seems to change about them: they don’t complain when things get difficult, but instead believe. They’re forcing us all to grow, but we don’t recognize their growth because it’s too consistent. People with the gift of faith are like an oak tree in the front yard. It’s growth is slow and steady. It’s not until we reflect on pictures of the tree when it was small that we realize that it has been with us all along, and has been a subtle reminder of providence. God has cared for it, because it simply waited patiently for the sun and the rain. And something as simple as its leafs and fallen branches become a nurturing place for others.

We need people who will remind us of what we’re meant to be, and people with the gift of faith do just that. Every community needs someone who remembers what it’s all about: the gospel and the gospel alone—showing the love of Jesus to the world and the hope of salvation He offers.

We all need hope. And we all need someone to believe in us when we’ve stopped believing in ourselves. People with the gift of faith see God’s faithfulness working in us and through us. They recognize Jesus’ plan for our lives, as individuals and collectively as church communities; and they continue to remind us of it.

Who has faith no matter what in your community? How can you promote people with this gift?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Faith over Intellect? Intellect over Faith?

John Barry — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:34:47 -0800

Mind over matter. Faith over intellect. Wisdom over knowledge. We’re convinced that the alternative is better: that one of these is better than the other. But Paul says that knowledge is a gift. It’s not something to be set aside when you start believing, but incorporated.

Intellect itself convinces us that some people are more gifted with knowledge than others. We’ve been in classes with these people, and we all know the stories of the most gifted among them (e.g., Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison). But Paul is talking about a different kind of knowledge. It’s not just one about facts and numbers. (Although the type of people gifted with the type of knowledge Paul is referring to would likely be good with that as well.)

To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills (1 Corinthians 12:7–11 ESV).

Earlier in his letter to the Corinthians, Paul defines what he means by “knowledge,” or more aptly how the knowledge he is referring to defers from other kinds of knowledge in its purpose.

“I give thanks to my God always for you [all (this is a plural “you” in Greek)] because of the grace of God that was given you [all] in Christ Jesus, that in every way you [all] were enriched in him in all speech and all knowledge— even as the testimony about Christ was confirmed among you [all]” (1 Corinthians 1:4–6 ESV).

Knowledge is about enriching others. Its about the testimony of Christ among us. Intellect for intellect’s sake is a wasteful endeavor. (I’ll resist the urge to rant about the higher education system here, and the urge to rant about the problems with curriculum and teaching methods of many Biblical Studies and Theological Studies programs.)

In Graeco-Roman culture, knowledge was the basis of achieving not only higher status but (more often than not) a higher level of spirituality. This would later in church history, only about a generation after Paul, become a major issue. A religion, known today as Gnosticism (from the Greek word for knowledge, gnosis), would creep in that synchronized the ideas of Graeco-Roman culture with Christianity. They would exploit grace and make Christianity about knowledge instead of experience. Rather Christianity being about a constant living relationship with Jesus (and the salvation He brings through His death and resurrection for us), it would become about simply saying the right words and knowing the right things. Gnosticism was very popular, because it was easy and exciting, but that didn’t make it true.

This religious movement, in all its diverse forms, would produce works like the Gospel of Judas and the Gospel of Thomas. These fictional works, written in the epic of people that had previously died, would claim special knowledge about the workings of Jesus with His disciples, and that salvation comes through ascension to the special intellectual level they proposed.

Does Gnosticism sound like a familiar form of Christianity? That’s because it is. It’s rampant in our churches today: “If I say I believe (and I confirm it in my mind), I can do what I want through grace and God will still bless me with salvation (and other things).” It’s not usually proposed this way, but faith without actions is what’s often being preached. This type of faith is the type Jesus condemned, not confirmed, because its not faith at all. It’s admitting truth. Admission without action is useless.

Jesus didn’t come to save through knowledge. But he also didn’t come to do away with knowledge. The lack of real knowledge about the biblical text is what allows for gnostic-like religion to continue in our churches today. If we knew what Jesus really said, and really believed, for ourselves, this problem would be minor or perhaps even absent.

Paul is proposing that we emphasize and acknowledge people with the gift of knowledge of God and His workings. Yet, this is one of the many things in our churches today that is downplayed, and it’s to our detriment.

We need people with knowledge (most of which likely hold the spiritual office of teacher). Without them, we will lose our way.

How can your church cultivate knowledge, and especially emphasize the needs for those with it to speak to others about it regularly?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Where's God Today?

John Barry — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:39:12 -0800

“Where’s God today?” is one of the most common questions I’m asked after I tell someone that I’m a Christian. The question implies that in a suffering world it’s hard to believe a good God exists. We struggle with this question, but I’m beginning to think that we do so for all the wrong reasons.

The rhetorical question of “Where’s God today?” makes me ask the question “Why isn’t the Church making this clear?” If it’s our duty as Christians to show others who God is by living like Jesus—in love, kindness, and generosity—then the fact that this question is being asked reflects poorly on us, not God. We struggle with answering it because we, as Christian communities, are struggling with our faith.

An example: There is enough wealth in the world to solve world hunger and the water crisis, even in the midst of famines in places like the Horn of Africa. So the question isn’t “Why isn’t God providing?” but “Why aren’t we as Christians in wealthy nations responding?” Self-sacrifice has become a colloquialism in Christianity, while the way of the cross is, in actuality, being set aside.

But the world’s problems aren’t the only reason why Christians are asked, “Where is God?” We’re showing little evidence that God is here today—as an actor in our midst performing miracles and gifting us with other gifts—and is always accessible. Likewise, wisdom has become uncommon. It’s something we seek and learn through prayer, simple observations of how the world functions, and experience. (The basis for this is the sources of wisdom in Proverbs that are cited: teachers, observing people and nature, and seeking God’s direct guidance.) The experience part most of us get, but the prayer part most of us are terrible at. And many of the people in our communities that have wisdom, like the elderly, are not looked to as teachers, but instead are set aside; we as Christians often treat them like everyone else in our culture—as second class.

In his first letter to the Corinthians, Paul presents an alternative.

To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills (1 Corinthians 12:7–11 ESV).

For Paul, wisdom is one of the ways that God shows who He is through us. It demonstrates His presence to those around us. It’s a gift from Him. And like other spiritual gifts, it’s for the purpose of being helpful (a perhaps better gloss of “good” in 1 Corinthians 12:7). This helpfulness should be directed towards God’s purposes: growing the church and simply loving others.

The “utterance” or “word” of wisdom is steeped in tradition: primarily the book of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes. And related to the wisdom tradition is the story of Job, Songs of Solomon, and the Psalms.

If you want to know what it means to be wise, spend some time in Proverbs. (Every time I do, I find out how far I still need to go in my spiritual journey. Proverbs is meant to humble us and teach us; that’s precisely what it does.) Proverbs tell us “For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth comes knowledge and understanding.” It also says that when we become wise that “Then you will understand righteousness and justice and equity, every good path; for wisdom will come into your heart, and knowledge will be pleasant to your soul” (Proverbs 2:6, 9–10 ESV).

And all of this is directly connected to what we choose to do about the world’s problems and what we encourage other people to do. Proverbs makes this point as well:

I, wisdom, dwell with prudence, and I find knowledge and discretion. The fear of the Lord is hatred of evil. ... Pride and arrogance and the way of evil and perverted speech I hate. … I walk in the way of righteousness, in the paths of justice, granting an inheritance to those who love me, and filling their treasuries … The Lord possessed me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old. Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before the beginning of the earth. (Proverbs 8:1, 20–21, 22–24).

We learn in John’s Gospel that Jesus Himself is this wisdom (John 1:1). The same language is actually reflected here in Paul’s letter: “the word of wisdom.” (“Word” is a more literal translation of “utterance”—both are based on the same Greek word, logos.) By acting upon wisdom, we act upon the very belief set that Jesus established—His very personhood is shown through acts of self-sacrifice.

If we could simply follow the way of the sage through the power of the Holy Spirit, we would all be much more Christ like. And some are more gifted in this than others—it’s to them that we should look to when attempting to discern a difficult decision.

Wisdom is only hard to come by today because we do not seek it. In a letter by James, (likely the brother of Jesus), we’re told: “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. But let him ask in faith, with no doubting” (James 1:5).

If we could find our way back towards valuing wisdom, and placing an emphasis on it, perhaps less people would ask, “Where is God?” and more would ask, “How can I know Him?”

Are there people in your Church who seem to be wise; do people look to them for guidance? How would you recommend we, as Christians, begin to place an emphasis on wisdom again?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Onward Towards a Better Way

John Barry — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:00:00 -0800

Worry and anxiety is a driving force in our thought patterns and consequently our spirituality. We’re so concerned with deciphering right from wrong that fear becomes our ally rather than the Spirit, and fear is really the enemy.

I think it’s for these reasons that God’s very mysterious work is often sidelined. Take any round of prayers at a church and you can see this. We all want others to pray about medical conditions, but few stand up and say, “Let me pray over you and ask God to take this away.” I say this as one who is guilty of not responding correctly. Likewise, we present medical problems as something to be prayed about, but rarely have the kind of honesty that even an Alcoholic’s Anonymous group would have: “I’m John and I’m a sinner. This [you name it] happened recently and has made me tempted to [you name it].” Or, “I gave into [you name it] sin recently, and need prayer so that I can overcome it.”

I’m not suggesting a 12-step based Christianity. Instead, I’m suggesting the kind of honesty that empowers us to utilize the spiritual gifts we each have been given, so that we can help one another. Medical problems are generally easy to talk about, because no one blames sin for those, but when it comes to spiritual struggles that are equally (and at times much more) detrimental, we’re silent. We will name the sin in our communities, but rarely admit to it. The shame is too much. Yet, the freedom of Christ suggests that an admittance, and cry out for prayer, is precisely what we need—grace not only permits this but promotes it. Honesty really is the best policy.

We’re meant for a purpose: to help one another. But we’re meant to do that in unique ways. Paul’s description of how God works in our communities, using gifts, subtly explains why the problems I’ve described here exist.

Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good (1 Corinthians 12:4–7 ESV).

First, there are gifts. And there is no reason to be concerned about how they will be used, or who will get what gifts, because they will be unified under the banner of God’s Spirit. Then, there are different ways in which people serve. Here, Paul is likely alluding to the acts of service required for ministries to function. He tells us that these are empowered by the same “ruler” or “Yahweh” (the Greek word for Lord, Kurios, here either means the divine name, Yahweh, or simply “ruler” or “master”). Paul is referring to Jesus, whom he often calls by this title. God’s service is empowered by the one that saved us.

Paul then references various activities, which he tells us come from the same God—the source of the empowerment we seek. In this description of the trinity’s work, Paul explains that God is at work among us through all three of His persons in three different, but very similar, ways. And spiritual gifts seem to be the mode of operation for all three acts. That idea presents something beautiful: God’s Spirit operates within us, using us, for His purposes of bringing unity and love to the world. It’s us, who don’t deserve an opportunity, that have a chance to do His work.

It’s possible that by using the terms “services” and “activities” Paul is classifying various types of gifts, and perhaps even using “activities” as a word to distinguish church offices, apart from spiritual gifts alone and spiritual services (perhaps a classification or type of gifts). This case could be made based on Paul’s usage of the word “activities” to later refer to something that is distinctly a spiritual office (according to the syntax of 1 Corinthians 12:27–28), being miracles. However, this seems unlikely: If Paul is distinguishing between spiritual offices, services, and merely gifts, he likely would have been clearer in his syntax, like he is in 1 Corinthians 12:27–28. There, he uses “first … second … third … then …” to list spiritual offices, before turning to “then gifts …” to offer a list of spiritual gifts. Here, in 1 Corinthians 12:4–7, it appears that Paul isn’t making distinctions between the types of things God offers people, but instead using synonyms for the same kinds of things. After all, spiritual offices require spiritual gifts. Furthermore, if Paul distinguished any further between types, he may have just helped the cause he was arguing against: disunity due to a belief that speaking in tongues, or practicing other gifts, makes someone more spiritual than others.

If it’s the case that Paul is using synonyms, then there is another lesson here for us: Spiritual gifts are first gifts—given by God—and are then services we perform for others and activities we do. This makes sense in light of the other defining features Paul uses when discussing gifts, like that they are meant for unity and showing love, for the sake of spiritual growth.

Yet, spiritual gifts—even though they have such a great purpose—are often set aside, either because post-enlightenment logic convinces us that they’re not real, or we’re afraid of the possibility that promoting them will allow for a rapid disunity of our churches. (This demotion of spiritual gifts is very subtle, basically to the point of quiet abandonment.) The concern is that spiritual gifts will be abused to hurt others and perhaps even dispose good leadership. But the truth of the matter is that they’re probably already at work in our communities and that we’re just not acknowledging them. And if our leaders are really those chosen by God, they’re probably holding spiritual offices without calling them that, and God is waiting to use those offices in unexpected ways, when our hearts are open to Him doing so.

God is no respecter of persons, as the saying goes. And when we let the Spirit work among us, it will do things we may not like, but it’s for the good of God’s work in our communities. This may even mean that leadership is disposed. As someone in church leadership, I’m ready to take that risk, because the price of not following God’s will in this matter is far more detrimental. Not following God’s will, and the subtle abandonment of His plan and purposes, is the true risk; yet, somehow this is often overlooked.

Paul tells us that if it’s really the Spirit working, we will see the same Lord and God at work among the gifts—meaning, God’s vision will be clear. This clarity not only could be, but will be, the best thing that ever happened to our church communities.

How can you enable the work of the Spirit in your community? How is it currently being hindered and how can you kindly and humbly change that?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Spiritual Gifts: A Definition

John Barry — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:16:00 -0800

It’s virtually impossible to distinguish between something a believer in Jesus is good at and a spiritual gift. At first this is frustrating, but doesn’t it make sense? If God is one—and we are one with Him through accepting Jesus and His Spirit—why would He not use our “talents” as “gifts”? When you frame the situation as God being the source of all, this pragmatic approach becomes holistic, and the search for gifts in our communities suddenly becomes simple.

Gifts don’t always entail the shockingly miraculous, although that’s certainly part of the picture. The talent you may take for granted is every bit as essential to your church community as the miracle working power of someone else. There is a hierarchy of church offices, for the sake of order, but this doesn’t make anyone more valuable to God’s work than someone else. The apostle is not greater than the prophet, and the prophet is not greater than the administrator. Those with the gift of tongues are no better than the interpreters of them; and the interpreters of tongues are not more valuable than the “shepherds,” or those with the gift of “helps.” Paul makes this point in his first letter to the Corinthians:

Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good (1 Corinthians 12:4–7 ESV).

There is diversity among the gifts, but they all come from God’s Holy Spirit. And by nature of their source being the same, none are better than others. And the kicker: all are required, as Paul tells us in Ephesians 4 and throughout 1 Corinthians 11–13. All are not just needed—they’re necessary.

But what does Paul mean by “gift”? His usage of the word elsewhere tells us. He says to Timothy: “Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophecy when the council of elders laid their hands on you” (1 Timothy 4:14 ESV). Timothy’s gift was identified by the elders (people in church offices) via the office of prophecy. They did so by acting in a faithful way: laying their hands on him to pray. Note that it’s not as if this just came out of nowhere: they were seeking God’s guidance. This means that a definition of spiritual gifts must include the idea that God is sought, and that He answers through the use of other spiritual offices. This very well could mean direct revelation.

Paul later tells Timothy in another letter: “For this reason I remind you to fan into flame the gift of God, which is in you through the laying on of my hands” (2 Timothy 1:6 ESV). This further suggests that spiritual gifts often come upon people through prayer, and consequently a type of spiritual anointing. It also suggests that a definition of spiritual gifts must include an acknowledgment that they come from God and that they must continually be rekindled, like a fire needs to be.

Peter also uses the term, when he says, “As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace” (1 Peter 4:10 ESV). Peter tells us that all believers receive spiritual gifts, and that they must be used for helping others; also, they are given so that we can use them for God’s various purposes, being His different ways of demonstrating His grace through us.

For a definition of spiritual gifts, I offer: “Abilities given by God through the Holy Spirit to all believers in Jesus—for the purpose of serving others so that the Church may grow.” And I would add: “They are to be discerned by the individual and other believers holding church offices through prayer, and are often anointed upon someone by another believer via the power of the Holy Spirit; that person is usually someone with the office of prophecy. Spiritual gifts are to be regularly renewed and strengthened, as well as stewarded wisely, according to the various ways God would have someone to utilize them. Their purpose is to be used for the common good—unity and love—of the church and all people: to manifest the salvation, restoration and renewal that Jesus alone brings through His sacrificial death and continued work through the Holy Spirit. For this reason, all spiritual gifts and offices are needed and required in gatherings of believers in Jesus.”

What do you think of this definition of spiritual gifts? Would you add anything to it or take anything away?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Spiritual gifts or curses?

We don’t compare ourselves to Elijah but should

Treating pastors like restaurant managers

Jesus in a cashmere sweater

Banishing Sunday school teachers

Spiritual gridlock: the end of miracles?

The myth of the apolitical church

Healing: it's what we all need

Help: a war cry, not a cry of desperation

Administrators: leaders, not paper pushers

Speaking in tongues: not crazy, just different

Interpreting, (well) everything

The higher gifts: an owner's manual

Why pastors never meet expectations

Looney tunes and the church

Purpose: it's confusing

"Be a man"

Growing pains: don't be like Mike

I don't want you to be uninformed

I Don’t Want You to Be Uninformed

John Barry — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:14:19 -0800

We provide for the media empire: Most of us are obsessed with information. In a way, the love of media represents our endless search to find meaning. The news gives us something to obsess over, talk about, and pretend that we can do something about. We look to fill the gap in our beings with information, when only God can fulfill it. In our search to be informed, we’re uninformed. This disconnect is rooted in not just our lack of understanding of self, but also the Spirit. Paul makes a similar point when discussing spiritual gifts.

Now concerning spiritual gifts, brothers, I do not want you to be uninformed. You know that when you were pagans you were led astray to mute idols, however you were led. Therefore I want you to understand that no one speaking in the Spirit of God ever says “Jesus is accursed!” and no one can say “Jesus is Lord” except in the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:1–3 ESV).

It is by the Holy Spirit’s work that we can declare “Jesus is Lord.” This point is so undersold that I hadn’t thought about it for years until rereading this passage about a week ago. It’s often remarked in Christian circles, “Jesus does the saving” or “God does the work,” but how often do we acknowledge that the very confession that “Jesus is Lord” requires the Holy Spirit?

The Spirit is usually only welcomed to the after party of the confessing: “He will come,” we say. But in a true confession, He is already there.

When Paul says that “Jesus is Lord,” he may mean two things simultaneously. If he is using the Greek word Kurios, “Lord,” like the ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament (the Septuagint), then he means “Jesus is Yahweh (God’s holy name).” He is declaring that Jesus is the God of Israel. If Paul is using kurios as “master” or “ruler” (another way the Greek word is used), then he is declaring that “Jesus is master” and thus the one that people owe allegiance to. It seems likely that Paul means both ideas, since the first presupposes the idea of the second and the second would hint at the meaning of the first. But whatever the precise meaning, it’s a powerful thought: The Holy Spirit is not only the reason for confessing Jesus as ruler and/or God, but instead the Spirit is required.

This is the framework for how Paul understands spiritual gifts. He makes the point that the Corinthian believers were at one point led by mute idols (astray), and will now be led by the Spirit through the works of spiritual gifts. Prior to coming to Christ they were led, but they will now be led the right way. We’re all curious what the “right” way looks like; this is especially the case when it comes to discerning true spiritual gifts. Paul discredits this notion: “no one speaking in the Spirit of God ever says ‘Jesus is accursed!’ ” That’s his defining factor: the thing he uses to make sense of the real Spirit versus evil spirits. If someone opposes Jesus, they’re not from God. It’s that simple.

Paul may have said this to fight Jewish mystics or pagan priests since both performed signs and wonders to prove their validity as God’s or the gods’ representatives. Paul’s framework for spiritual gifts requires a confession that Jesus is Lord, and as such, a submission to His reign.

It seems that we need similar guidance. But our idols today are not mute but vocal. They speak loudly through the boxes in our living rooms. We stare at them in amazement, believing that somehow the information provided will satisfy. Paul cries out against this; he claims the work of the Spirit, in spiritual gifts, as a better way. He declares that the Spirit’s work will be clearly defined—and defy the work of evil.

What idols do you need to tear down? And what walls have you built against the Spirit’s authentic work in you?

Join the movement. Be the first to know. Sign up for updates here.

Want to read the entire series? Here is a round-up:

Spiritual gifts or curses?

We don’t compare ourselves to Elijah but should

Treating pastors like restaurant managers

Jesus in a cashmere sweater

Banishing Sunday school teachers

Spiritual gridlock: the end of miracles?

The myth of the apolitical church

Healing: it's what we all need

Help: a war cry, not a cry of desperation