Tuesday night was one of the most interesting and enjoyable experiences I’ve had in some time. For two and a half hours I had a conversation with fourteen skeptics from the Freethought Alliance of Orange County at a beautiful home in Villa Park. Their questions for me ranged from stem cell research to separation of church and state as well as the common ground shared by atheists and Christians. There were both men and women ranging in ages from 22-80. We will post the video in a few weeks for those who want to see it in person. I was also able to ask questions of them. Rather than try to “nail” them with tough apologetic questions (as some of my friends suggested) I wanted to build common ground and try to understand how they perceive Christians. Here are some of the questions I asked them and how they responded. I don’t necessarily agree with all their responses, but there are some powerful lessons here that Christians need to take to heart. These are not direct quotes, but my best reconstructions of the heart of what they said. SEAN: WHAT BAD IMPRESSIONS DO CHRISTIANS LEAVE?
WHAT BLIND SPOTS DO CHRISTIANS HAVE?
HOW CAN CHRISTIANS IMPROVE THEIR INTERACTIONS WITH ATHEISTS?
WHAT EVIDENCE FOR GOD WOULD BE COMPELLING TO ATHEISTS?
I listened to their concerns and did my best to articulate the Christian position as clearly and graciously as I could. We genuinely had a good time. As soon as many of the guests realized that I was not there to attack them and truly wanted to understand what they believed, their guards were quickly dropped. At the end of the evening each of the skeptics expressed how much they enjoyed the evening and hoped it would only be the beginning. The next morning I received an email from one of the younger skeptics who grew up in a southern Baptist church but has since rejected his Christian roots. He is now a philosophy major at a local university. The subject heading was titled, “Kindred spirit.” He opened his email by saying “I first want to thank you for the engaging and thoughtful discussion that you provided. Throughout my history I have found few ‘men of the cloth’ to be as open about philosophical discourse and criticism as you were last night.” Then he asked if we could meet up for some coffee. I’m already looking forward to it. I don’t share this to give myself a pat on the back. It’s not about me. It’s about Christians learning to follow Peter’s advice to give an answer for what we believe with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15). In my next post I am going to offer some reflections from the evening. In the meantime, I would love to hear any of your thoughts. Should Christians engage in this type of dialogue? Why or why not? How should we approach such a dialogue? Any thoughts or concerns are welcome. |

EMAIL THIS PAGE
PRINT
RSS









Comments
I have to agree with you 100%. A lot of times we are judged because we judge others harshly. Sometimes we need to step back and really respect and LOVE others. We tend to forget the fact that we ALL fall short of the glory of God. We are all sinners. Yes we are called to be separate in our lifestyles but not in our association. I think Christians really need to do this. A lot of times we spend our lives living in a bubble condemning the world while we sit doing nothing about it. We really need to reach out to people, and YES even atheists. I find conversations with atheists very stimulating. We need to be able to share the gospel of Christ and what He did for us and others. If people don't want to listen, that's another story. I have a friend Jackie who is pretty skeptical about things and she always says she loves discussing religion with me. I love having dialogue with her and explaining to her why I believe what I do. Even though we have disagreements, I pray and hope one day she will be saved. So yes, I really do believe we should engage in this dialogue and we should approach it openly and respectfully. If people disagree, fine. There's no need to become defensive and angry about it, but love them to the truth. That doesn't mean be a doormat to everyone but to be astute, respectful, militant, and overall loving. If we allow God to change our hearts and help us, I think it's pretty much easy from there. God gave us the ability to articulate, it's our hearts that needs changing. We need God's love, wisdom, discernment and His guidance in it all and we can never replace the holy spirit and its power with articulate arguments and evidences.
I am an atheist.
And I am compassionate, I feel empathy, and love. I value logic, clear-thinking and knowledge. And I am content in the knowledge, that like everything else on the planet, I will die one day.
I think hypocrisy probably is the biggest reason non-believers don't ever except Christ. Christians are supposed to be ambassadors for Christ yet often times they leave a bad impression to slander, gossip, malice, infidelity, etc.
- high school youth group activities
First, thank you for a thought provoking article. I consider myself an evangelic Christian but do not proselitize (pardon spelling). I attempt to promote Christianity by the way I live my life, in the answers I give those who ask and by giving credit to God when people try to credit me. I have found that many non-Christians know more about the bible, the life and the teachings of Jesus than most of my Christian sisters and brothers. This is truly a sad comintary on the state of Christianity. I have heard the same comments from non-believers as you. As long as so many Christians profess their faith with their mouths and not their lives we are forceing non-believers away instead of attracting them. One of my favorite quotes - "Preach the gospel at all times and, if necessary, speak." - really hits the target. Jesus said all that needs to be said. Our job is to live the lives He tells us to so that others will be drawn by our example. A helping hand, a careing heart, recognition, a good example, and especially love are what draws people to Jesus, not any amount of words.
I do not see anything wrong with having a civilized conversation with an unbeliever. They are also people that God loves and even Jesus, the one that we strive to represent on Earth, sat and ate with unbelievers. I agree that we miss the mark and do not represent Jesus as we should all of the time. I see this is as a wake up call, we should be more aware of how we are percieved by others. Talking gives us a chance to give the reason for the the hope that we have and explain that accepting Jesus as our Lord does not make us perfect.
Thanks, Sean. Great insights. This past year God has been teaching me a lot about approaching skeptics with gentleness and respect (also Colossians 4:5-6). Thanks for providing a good example for all of us. We need to be quick to judge ourselves and we are to judge those inside the Church but not those outside (1 Corinthians 5:9-13).
A very nice article...thanks! I am curious, though - since this was supposedly a conversation, why were you not allowed to ask the exact same questions of them that they asked of you? (e.g. how atheists can improve their interactions with Christians? Or what blind spots you think atheists have?). I'm all for building bridges and helping people feel as non-defensive as possible for the sake of promoting discourse, but I'm also a bit weary of the widespread perception that it's only the Christians who need to be more introspective and self-critical.
Great question. Yes, I was able to ask questions back of them. But we also had them as guests to our church last Sunday night where the focus was on them. You are totally right that BOTH Christians and non-Christians have something to work on. In fact, I'll be posting another blog next week with some observations I learned that will apply to some things skeptics can work on.
Cool. Thank you!
Yes, Sean, I think approaching dialogues with atheists in this spirit is the right thing to do. I've read a number of your blog posts and watched your hour-long video where you role-played an atheist. You are making a positive impact for Christ.
I agree with you that perhaps the majority of young people raised in the pews (not to mention the adults who are sitting all around them) are ill-prepared and ill-equipped to deal with secular society's objections to the gospel of Christ. I am concerned, however, that it's impractical to think that any of us will ever be as well-equipped as you are (given your training in philosophy, broad experience, and so on). How do you see Johnny and Janie Doe being able to deal lovingly and effectively with secular humanists who want to discuss evolution, philosophy, cosmology, and more?
http://blogforthelordjesuscurrentevents.wordpress.com