EMAIL THIS PAGE       PRINT       RSS      

The Top Three Things to Remember if You want to be a “Christian Apologist.”

The apologist’s profession had a noble beginning, defined from the Greek as “speaking in defense.” These heroes of the faith storm into the halls of the damned, defending the faith by picking fights in Berkeley. Yes, they get a lot of press. They are often sought after for their opinions, as the Christian faith encounters new and unsavory elements of the unsaved.

But what does it take to be a Christian apologist these days? It seems like they are popping up all over the place, writing blogs and books. They become authoritative by using that old name, “apologist,” but what do they actually need to know to take that hallowed title? For all those aspiring storm troopers of the faith, I give you:

The three top things to remember if you are a Christian apologist!

First, you make your living through controversy.

Like old time ambulance chasers, you always have to be on the lookout for “issues” that people are upset about. Evolution, homosexuality, exploitation of Presidential candidates, whatever. Once you get a volatile and excitable issue, you are set! Before it dies down, write a blog, a book, whatever. Milk it hard, baby, ‘cause you don’t know when the next ambulance will come around the corner! If you prefer to be proactive, forget it. Nobody cares about what they are not currently upset about. The issue needs to be something people are living in fear of, like democrats.

Second, polarization is your best friend.

You, my little Apologist, must love polarization like your sweet mother loves visits on Christmas. In fact, without it, you don’t really have much of a purpose. Just like democrats feed off of not being republicans, conservative apologists feed off of not being liberal. The more you split people on an issue, the more secure you are in your job. Hey, you have kids to feed!

If there is not a public issue you can polarize, then create one. Evolution is always good, and you can call it “Darwinism” if you want to get the older crowd. So, if nothing scary is happening, just take a nice deep breath and holler “EVOLUTION!” It’s like shouting “marijuana” at a jam-packed Third Day concert; it will get them every time!  

Third, rhetoric is your only tool.

Blah blah blah. Actions don’t matter, just words. Very little needs to be done, because what can you actually do? I mean, what can any apologist actually do about evolution? Heck, you probably never even studied science! But as the good book says, science doesn’t matter, just theology. Anyway, always remember that because you are an “apologist” you can be an expert on anything! If someone questions your words, just tell them you are an apologist. If they persist, tell them they are a liberal. Even if they don’t shut up, no one else in the church will listen to them.

So, there you have it. If you lost your job in the building industry because of the housing implosion, don’t worry, become an apologist! If you want to write a book, but have no idea what to write, become an apologist! You can make a living by doing nothing, just start arguments, and if you get pushed into a dirty corner by someone who knows what they are talking about, just shout “I’m an apologist!”

Comments

Oh no you di'int!

Oh yes. I did. : )

Broad brushes can be very useful to get something done in a hurry, like painting the side of a barn, but they often miss the fine detail required to get into the corners and trim around the edges, like you need to do on a house. I get the point that many people abuse the art of apologetics, in particular Christian apologetics, by engaging in the kinds of shameful behavior and tactics you describe. But does that mean nobody should do apologetics when it comes to explaining our Christian hope?

Too often people have used apologetics to defend the Christian faith, but apologetics, when done correctly and in the spirit of 1 Peter 3:15-16 (including the part about gentleness and respect), is more about explaining the truth about God than it is about defending him. Christian apologetics is most useful when it points to a correct point of view rather than trying to disprove someone else's view.

In the last century, C.S. Lewis was a master at this, and "Mere Christianity" was his masterpiece. In this century, Tim Keller's "The Reason For God" is in my view the finest book currently in print that offers a reasonable explanation for the Christian faith. Keller and many others I could name don't make their living through controversy, they don't polarize, and rhetoric is not their only tool. But they are fine examples of what it means to clearly explaining the Christian hope in way that is gentle and respectful.

Thanks so much for your comment, Stan. Always glad to hear from you!

Yes, I do agree that there are some fine men and women out there who are engaging the faith and culture intelligently. I suspect those who are doing the work of the apologist are those who would not call themselves apologists. But in this day and age of individual voices, it seems too easy to take that on and determine that you represent the faith, while in reality you only represent yourself.

To be honest, Stan, I'm so tired of seeing blogs/posts/declarations from the self proclaimed apologists that only embarrass themselves and the church. For example, who are we to call other people "Darwinists" and think we can simply place them in that rhetorical box? What does that do?

I also love that passage in 1 Peter. In my study of it, I think Peter was writing about other Christians in 1 Peter 3. The context would seem to be the church. It's very interesting to note that when Peter quotes Isaiah 8 "do not fear . . . " he is referring to another instance when God had to remind one of his own that His people are the issue, not those around Israel.

I share your weariness with so-called "self-proclaimed apologists" who have an agenda and seem to do more harm than good. Perhaps the word "apologist" has even been tainted by the actions of misguided people (kind of like the word "evangelical"). That's why I love what Tim Keller is doing. He would probably not call himself an apologist, but he is doing a magnificent job of explaining the Christian faith in a way that's clear and intellectually viable, yet winsome and inviting. And he embraces doubt, which is something the people you are referring to in your post never do. As Frederick Buechner famously wrote, "If there's no room for doubt, there's no room for me."

Your insights into 1 Peter 3:15-16 are instructive. Thanks!

Love that quote, Stan, and I'm afraid that I had not heard it before. Thanks. Think that needs to go on my facebook page. Or maybe a future post. : )

I guess I go with Mark 9:40 on this one. It's just difficult for me to hold any brother or sister in Christ up to ridicule short of serious moral turpitude or apostasy. And even then I feel a little dirty about doing so. I go with the big tent philosophy, and I think I'm in pretty good company.

Ron, it was good to hear from you again. It's been a while!

As part of our digital age, I went back through the comments looking for a person who goes by "mark940," but could not find them. Lol. Then I looked it up.

I agree. And I also get what you are saying about how you can "feel a little dirty." My daughters (ages 15 and 19) have pushed me in a couple of ways, seeing how far my tent can stretch. At times I think I'm stretching too far, but as I look back they were usually right. Or maybe I'm just accommodating?

Hi Mark,

I am too saddened by the effect that many of our more vocal and controversial brothers have, and the points you raise are all valid. I think that these points are symptomatic rather than the actual issue. The issue at hand is "not keeping the main thing the main thing", and the main thing is building Kingdom.

As other commenters have said, we are obliged to give an account for and present a reasonable defense of what we believe. As a matter of natrural consequence to our accepting Jesus as our saviour, we need to be able to articulate the validity of our faith, even in the face of ridicule and accusation. That, in my mind, is real and valid apologetics.

By taking aim at those who abuse that obligation, we're taking our eye off the main thing, and instead of building we're breaking. We can't do that. We need to point to Jesus, every time. I'm not saying don't call them out, I'm saying that if how we address these things doesn't result in the kingdom advancing, we're better off not addressing it at all.

Looking forward to more stimulating reading.

Jim

Thanks for your comment, Jim. I have a very good friend who often states that phrase, "keep the main thing the main thing." And it is hard! So much of "me" get's involved with issues that there is often not much room for anything else, including the kingdom. Thanks for a great reminder.

Hi Mark,

I found your post incredibly condescending and arrogant. Who are you to call "apologists" out...just like you criticize apologists for calling Darwinists out. I find it very interesting that you are criticizing poeple for doing exactly what you are doing. That is not Christ-like.

I am an apologist and proud of it. I do not get paid for being an apologist and in fact probably spend about $40k per year travelling, engaging, writing, preaching and the like to help Christians and non-believers understand that Christianity can be plausibly defended.

Pointing out the flaws of those who jump into apologetics and do a disservice to the faith is important, but it should be kept at an individual level with specific examples of poor behaviour. Generalizing does no one good...just like you said that broad brushes against "Darwinists" is out of line.

Dan

Hi, Dan!

First, thanks for commenting. Even though you obviously did not agree or enjoy it, I appreciate that you took the time to write something.

It strikes me a little funny that as an apologist you would start off with "incredibly condescending and arrogant." But I guess that's a good honest response! : )
I certainly see why you would take offense, Dan. I did use too broad of a brush stroke. If I re-wrote it, I would narrow the application.

I think we come at this from two very different angles, though. I honestly have not had a lot of need to "defend" my faith. Maybe that's because I have compromised it, honestly not sure. But as I live my life I do have opportunities to come along side people I know and love. I don't have to defend much, but do have to be ready to encourage and define.

I hope God needs both of us!

Thanks for getting back to me Mark. I am pretty straight forward, so if I sounded annoyed, I actually was! Your response was kind, so I appreciate that. I have a fellow apologist I work with, Hill Roberts, who made the apt statement that if you want to make a living, do not get into apologetics. The vast majority of people in apologetics spend money to defend the faith. I had the sense from your post that you see apologetics as a career or just a way to leverage your faith.

I think it is amazing that you have not had the need to defend your faith. Do you talk to non-believers about the faith? I live in Boston and I am surrounded by non-believers. Most folks think that it is bizarre that I am a believer or they think it is just a different color of ice cream in the great pool of available worldview choices. My wife is a converted Jew and her family is really upset about her conversion. I regularly engage people that are angry that I am a believer. Therefore, I am in a position to either defend the faith or walk away.

I guess we come at this in very different ways. Yes, I have great conversations about my faith and the faith of others. But they are not in the context of anger. If people know me, they are curious, not angry. My wife and I are the only believers in either of our families. We live in a town with a gay mayor and new-age study centers. We absolutely love it, because it is our community and these are our friends.

Why do you think people are being hostile to you? What's the cause of it?

Great question. People are angry for a number of reasons. First, they see that my wife is a believer which means to a Jew that she is no longer a Jew. I guess if your son converted to Islam and was awaiting the Mahdi and Muslim Jesus to slaughter all un repentant Christians, you might see how they view her conversion. It is amazing how many Jews think Hitler was a Christian.

Also, living in Boston, secularism is deeply ingrained in the culture. When you say that you are a Christian, they tend to immediatley think that you are going to judge them. The gay marriage issue up here is a big deal and if you oppose gay marriage, you are radically marginalized. It is taught in schools to first graders as an equal choice to traditional marriage. Therefore if you are against it, you are seen as a threat. Just being a Christian leads people to believe that you are against gay marriage.

Finally, they tend to think of Christians as hayseeds or worse, war mongers. Dawkins book was not needed up here because his thinking has already been accepted as fact.

Blessings in Christ
dAn

Hmmm. A controversial post. Certainly polarizing. Filled with rhetoric. Looks like you're well on your way to becoming an apologist, Mark! Seriously, this post simply slanders many good men and women in the church.

Brett, it's true, I wrote that post more out of frustration than love. As I noted in earlier replies, I wrote with too broad of a brush and have hopefully learned something. However, the crux of the issue is true. Just need to work on delivery!

I can certainly understand writing out of frustration and having regrets. But it wasn't merely your delivery that was mistaken, it was also the substance of your post.

Take a good look around, Brett. You might even try looking at things from another's perspective. If you do, you might just see something.

I've taken more than just a look, Mark. I've spent countless hours with these men and women. I've had late-night conversations with them, shared meals with them, been to their homes, seen them out of the spotlight and I can tell you that these are men and women who follow Jesus humbly and love people passionately.

Are there a few cranks? Sure. But we could point to a few cranks among any community, that do NOT represent the entire group. So to cast aspersions on the entire group by referring to them as ambulance-chasers, people who simply make up controversy, and folks without real jobs, is simply slander, as I said in my first comment.

I offer to you your own advice: Take a good look around, Mark. You might even try looking at things from another's perspective. If you do, you might just see something.

OK, Brett, I think I already responded to this, directly to you and in other comments on this blog. I guess you are being true to form. If you take a moment and look through the other comments here, you will see how I responded. God's best in working with heretics, solving the mystery of evil, and other matters. I'll enjoy following along.

»  Become a Fan or Friend of this Blogger
About
Mark has been working in higher education for over 15 years. He has served as a professor, a dean, and a college president. He has consulted and taught in over thirty-five countries.


Media